In Reply to: RE: Musical Fidelity V90-DAC rating posted by RGA on March 15, 2014 at 19:12:44:
Hi, RGA,
I did a search on John Atkinson and Musical Fidelity, as you suggested. There was a long list of threads, and while I didn't read them all, the only explanation I readily noticed was something about a relationship based on joint recording projects between Mr. Atkinson and Musical Fidelity. If that is the explanation, it strikes me as as wholly improper that such recording projects should impinge on the selection of product overage in the pages of Stereophile. If the publishers of the magazine somehow owe financial consideration to Musical Fidelity for Mr. Atkinson's recording projects, then, at most, it should be provided via reduced rate or free advertising space, and not via magazine product review selection.
_
Ken Newton
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Musical Fidelity V90-DAC rating - knewton 08:05:33 03/16/14 (6)
- RE: Musical Fidelity V90-DAC rating - John Atkinson 10:39:45 03/16/14 (5)
- RE: Musical Fidelity V90-DAC rating - knewton 17:09:31 03/16/14 (3)
- RE: Musical Fidelity V90-DAC rating - John Atkinson 10:12:19 03/17/14 (2)
- "go without any income for a month" - did he get a bonus though, for declaring it Class A product? - carcass93 08:29:00 03/18/14 (1)
- No (NT) - John Atkinson 10:11:57 03/18/14 (0)
- RE: Musical Fidelity V90-DAC rating - PhilB 12:21:49 03/16/14 (0)