In Reply to: RE: Shill. (NT) posted by John Atkinson on July 16, 2012 at 16:02:16:
That's right Atkinson. Circle the wagons. Come to Rubinson'e defense even though he jumped to a paranoid conclusion. You big-time editors and reviewers gotta watch each others backs, huh?
Your reviewer insults me, then expects no reply in kind?
You deserve every "old, tired, insulting canard" that I feel like throwing your way.
No, I won't "get over it", you pompous ass.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Shill. (NT) - abs1 20:57:57 07/16/12 (0)