In Reply to: Shill. (NT) posted by Kal Rubinson on July 15, 2012 at 16:05:42:
Shill?
ABSOLUTELY NOT!
The poster was lamenting the fact that he couldn't find a speaker that might fit his needs and was available for him to audition.
I suggested Tekton because I think they might be of interest to him, especially considering their 30 day in-home trial. I recently purchased a pair of these speakers and am very satisfied with them, that's all. I've no connection in any way to the company or its owner. Never met the man. I was merely trying to be helpful, and out of the blue I'm a shill?
I used to have respect for you, Kal. Sad to say that it's gone!
Watsamatta, you upset 'cause Tekton sells directly on the 'net and doesn't spend its money advertising in your magazine? Did Tekton break some kind of magazine reviewers code?
Your petty childish response was uncalled for. I really expected better from you. It's sad.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Shill. (NT) - abs1 06:18:29 07/16/12 (14)
- RE: Shill. (NT) - John Atkinson 16:02:16 07/16/12 (6)
- I strongly disagree, and . . . - JoshT 15:20:33 07/17/12 (4)
- Some shills are famous - mls-stl 11:54:41 07/18/12 (3)
- RE: Some shills are famous - Bill the K 18:37:22 07/18/12 (1)
- RE: Some shills are famous - abs1 04:07:09 07/19/12 (0)
- RE: Some shills are famous - abs1 12:26:33 07/18/12 (0)
- RE: Shill. (NT) - abs1 20:57:57 07/16/12 (0)
- I thought your post... - mkuller 08:39:05 07/16/12 (2)
- RE: I thought your post... - Bill the K 08:51:40 07/16/12 (1)
- RE: I thought your post... - abs1 11:14:50 07/16/12 (0)
- OK. OK. - Kal Rubinson 07:32:56 07/16/12 (3)
- Ah ...you see it's industry members (well manufacturers) that can't make unsolicited recommendations. nt - bjh 21:26:07 07/16/12 (2)
- RE: Ah ... - Kal Rubinson 06:43:25 07/17/12 (1)
- RE: Ah ... - soulfood 09:20:14 07/17/12 (0)