RE: 10 Audio is an excellent example of why reveiwers should not write bad reviews.

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Critics being critical: 10 Audio pans the Krell S-275 - jult52 10:25:45 06/14/12 (138)

RE: Critics being critical: 10 Audio pans the Krell S-275 - dtximages 08:55:24 09/01/22 (0)

RE: Critics being critical: 10 Audio pans the Krell S-275 - dtximages 09:53:14 08/31/22 (0)

RE: Critics being critical: 10 Audio pans the Krell S-275 - dtximages 08:27:12 08/30/22 (0)

RE: Critics being critical: 10 Audio pans the Krell S-275 - dtximages 11:15:55 08/29/22 (0)

RE: Critics being critical: 10 Audio pans the Krell S-275 - fantja 14:09:18 03/14/15 (0)

RE: Critics being critical: 10 Audio pans the Krell S-275 - mcsemikey1@yahoo.com 09:34:00 03/14/15 (1)

RE: Krell S-275 beats FPB600 - A.Wayne 11:34:44 03/17/15 (0)

RE: Critics being critical: 10 Audio pans the Krell S-275 - byegolly 04:16:58 10/03/12 (0)

RE: Critics being critical: 10 Audio pans the Krell S-275 - lakeallen5 13:53:02 09/27/12 (0)

RE: Critics being critical: 10 Audio pans the Krell S-275 - Inmate51 19:35:15 06/26/12 (17)

RE: Critics being critical: 10 Audio pans the Krell S-275 - RGA 07:14:24 06/27/12 (3)

Reviewers... - mkuller 08:48:01 06/27/12 (0)

RE: Critics being critical: 10 Audio pans the Krell S-275 - Inmate51 08:18:07 06/27/12 (0)

Good Post (nt) - Jack G 07:27:05 06/27/12 (0)

Good reviewers... - mkuller 21:04:37 06/26/12 (12)

RE: Good reviewers... - Inmate51 10:09:30 06/27/12 (8)

He never mentioned Julian Hirsch - Jack G 10:25:52 06/27/12 (6)

RE: He never mentioned Julian Hirsch - Inmate51 16:47:11 06/27/12 (0)

Julian Hirsch... - mkuller 10:30:48 06/27/12 (4)

I love the funny stories about him... - E-Stat 14:43:39 07/03/12 (0)

If you were in the market for a reviewer - 1973shovel 10:50:50 06/29/12 (0)

RE: Julian Hirsch... - Inmate51 16:51:42 06/27/12 (0)

Mine either - Jack G 10:57:53 06/27/12 (0)

No doubt... - mkuller 10:16:38 06/27/12 (0)

RE: Good reviewers... - soulfood 04:18:27 06/27/12 (2)

The magazines... - mkuller 08:50:08 06/27/12 (1)

RE: The magazines... - soulfood 12:29:18 06/27/12 (0)

RE: Critics being critical: 10 Audio pans the Krell S-275 - Linn 11:28:31 06/26/12 (6)

Krell S-275 & subs - What's up with that? - JerryS 18:53:41 06/27/12 (5)

RE: Krell S-275 & subs - What's up with that? - soulfood 07:29:33 06/28/12 (4)

RE: Krell S-275 & subs - What's up with that? - JerryS 07:42:56 06/28/12 (3)

Further thoughts on subwoofer phase - JerryS 10:07:01 06/30/12 (0)

RE: Krell S-275 & subs - What's up with that? - soulfood 08:45:42 06/28/12 (1)

RE: Krell S-275 & subs - What's up with that? - JerryS 08:56:01 06/28/12 (0)

Who cares what he thinks?? - Robert Hamel 09:06:29 06/26/12 (3)

Agree, but the fact is - JerryS 19:03:02 06/27/12 (2)

RE: Agree, but the fact is - soulfood 06:12:08 06/28/12 (1)

RE: Agree, but the fact is - Ralph 13:22:03 06/28/12 (0)

RE: Critics being critical: 10 Audio pans the Krell S-275 - bjh 10:47:32 06/25/12 (0)

10 Audio is an excellent example of why reveiwers should not write bad reviews. - Ralph 10:16:21 06/21/12 (59)

RE: 10 Audio is an excellent example of why reveiwers should not write bad reviews. - JerryS 07:02:17 06/27/12 (5)

Posts of yours elsewhere on Audioasylum.co belie this. - Ralph 08:57:42 06/27/12 (4)

yawn - JerryS 09:48:44 06/27/12 (3)

sweet. Here's another link - Ralph 10:49:05 06/27/12 (2)

Your vindictive, inaccurate, whining, petulant, outdated, smelly brown river of libelous personal attacks... - JerryS 14:57:31 06/29/12 (1)

Seems you can't stick to your own word elsewhere on this site. - Ralph 15:57:34 06/29/12 (0)

same experience - Grant 17:35:46 06/25/12 (2)

RE: same experience - JerryS 07:40:06 06/27/12 (0)

Yes, it seems that manufacturers need to be wary of him nt - Ralph 09:58:41 06/26/12 (0)

RE: 10 Audio is an excellent example of why reveiwers should not write bad reviews. - bjh 10:50:28 06/25/12 (6)

RE: 10 Audio is an excellent example of why reveiwers should not write bad reviews. - Ralph 12:33:07 06/25/12 (5)

RE: 10 Audio is an excellent example of why reveiwers should not write bad reviews. - bjh 12:41:20 06/25/12 (4)

My advice to you would be to learn some manners - Pinkus 11:19:02 06/26/12 (3)

It has now been pointed out to him that the "Stereophile reviewer (Steven Stone)" who panned his preamp - bjh 09:42:09 06/27/12 (2)

This stuff is all a matter of public record. - Ralph 13:11:11 06/28/12 (1)

RE: This stuff is all a matter of public record. - Cpk 14:57:42 06/28/12 (0)

RE: 10 Audio is an excellent example of why reveiwers should not write bad reviews. - John Atkinson 07:34:44 06/24/12 (19)

FIXED - Jerry Seigel, B.S., MBA, age 57, Occupation: company president - JerryS 07:11:44 06/28/12 (1)

RE: FIXED - Jerry Seigel, B.S., MBA, age 57, Occupation: company president - John Atkinson 04:33:49 06/29/12 (0)

RE: 10 Audio is an excellent example of why reveiwers should not write bad reviews. - bjh 10:52:46 06/25/12 (0)

RE: 10 Audio is an excellent example of why reveiwers should not write bad reviews. - Ralph 07:48:26 06/25/12 (2)

Yet another example of you being WRONG, WRONG WRONG! - JerryS 08:34:48 06/28/12 (1)

You can't ignore the truth of your own posts on this website. - Ralph 13:08:10 06/28/12 (0)

Agree with exception to the omission of authoring being an error. - soulfood 08:46:55 06/24/12 (12)

RE: Agree with exception to the omission of authoring being an error. - John Atkinson 11:38:57 06/24/12 (11)

RE: Agree with exception to the omission of authoring being an error. - soulfood 11:47:23 06/24/12 (10)

RE: Agree with exception to the omission of authoring being an error. - John Atkinson 14:59:21 06/24/12 (9)

RE: Agree with exception to the omission of authoring being an error. - soulfood 15:52:44 06/24/12 (8)

Names... - RGA 17:08:44 06/24/12 (7)

RE: yes - Cpk 07:10:08 06/25/12 (0)

RE: Names... - soulfood 18:55:26 06/24/12 (5)

LOL - Nothing to gain! Absolutely!!! - JerryS 13:21:49 06/28/12 (0)

Considering that all 10 Audio reviews are done by Jerry S, what are his "questionable review standards" ? nt - Rick W 09:33:11 06/25/12 (3)

It depends. Is 'considering' a fact or the same as 'if'. -nt - soulfood 11:58:28 06/25/12 (2)

Maybe you should check the site out before opining about his review standards. nt - Rick W 12:52:27 06/25/12 (1)

Maybe, thanks. -nt - soulfood 13:11:52 06/25/12 (0)

"If it is genuinely bad, there simply should be no review at all. " - volunteer 06:14:01 06/24/12 (22)

IMO, a pan is more valuable than a rave to a potential buyer. - JerryS 09:20:50 06/29/12 (0)

Yes- we want honest reviews... - Ralph 07:45:50 06/25/12 (16)

RE: Yes- we want honest reviews... - Sstone8807@aol.com 08:03:32 08/22/14 (1)

RE: Yes- we want honest reviews... - minimus 15:11:19 10/20/14 (0)

He purchased the review sample !! - Shep 14:43:37 06/26/12 (2)

RE: Yes, my memory is playing tricks... - Ralph 15:15:29 06/26/12 (1)

Too Funny!!! nt - bjh 09:23:47 06/27/12 (0)

Not sure I follow you here... - jamesgarvin 20:49:37 06/25/12 (2)

Genuinely bad - Inmate51 23:26:21 06/25/12 (1)

The problem here is that you have no good way to know - Ralph 10:03:04 06/26/12 (0)

RE: Yes- we want honest reviews... - Linn 08:54:56 06/25/12 (1)

RE: Yes- we want honest reviews... - Ralph 09:14:15 06/25/12 (0)

Ralph, this statement is my only area of disagreement. - volunteer 08:19:22 06/25/12 (3)

Yes, we may have to disagree on that - Ralph 09:29:19 06/25/12 (2)

"I realized that bad reviews are often unethical," - volunteer 13:11:38 06/25/12 (1)

RE: "I realized that bad reviews are often unethical," - Ralph 14:36:49 06/25/12 (0)

RE: Yes- we want honest reviews... - rick_m 08:10:11 06/25/12 (1)

RE: Yes- we want honest reviews... - Ralph 09:07:01 06/25/12 (0)

First of all... - mkuller 14:03:14 06/24/12 (2)

RE: First of all... - hahax@verizon.net 20:18:39 06/24/12 (0)

"what if it's wrong?" - volunteer 14:11:02 06/24/12 (0)

RE: "If it is genuinely bad, there simply should be no review at all. " - rick_m 08:08:47 06/24/12 (0)

They seem to have no reliable reviewing methodology, so why care what they say? (nt) - Pat D 14:37:10 06/20/12 (11)

RE: They seem to have no reliable reviewing methodology, so why care what they say? (nt) - Tony Lauck 12:02:31 06/21/12 (3)

Look at it from a different perpective. - carcass93 13:05:38 06/21/12 (2)

RE: Look at it from a different perpective. - Tony Lauck 13:45:39 06/21/12 (1)

RE: Look at it from a different perpective. - rick_m 08:27:13 06/24/12 (0)

They listen - and express their opinion about what they heard. Seems pretty reliable to me. - carcass93 14:58:59 06/20/12 (6)

Many different answers, use what you can. - tmsorosk 16:33:18 06/20/12 (4)

I don't think it was a valid question, considering the posting history of the person who asked it. - carcass93 08:00:53 06/21/12 (2)

You have committed a classical logical fallacy. - Pat D 08:37:16 06/21/12 (1)

Nope, I did not. - carcass93 08:50:37 06/21/12 (0)

RE: Many different answers, use what you can. - Pat D 19:48:07 06/20/12 (0)

Like I said, not a reliable methodology. - Pat D 16:29:23 06/20/12 (0)

RE: Critics being critical: 10 Audio pans the Krell S-275 - tmsorosk 04:40:09 06/20/12 (0)

RE: Critics being critical: 10 Audio pans the Krell S-275 - RGA 18:25:11 06/15/12 (21)

So the rating system is perfect for you! - JerryS 06:37:14 06/28/12 (2)

RE: So the rating system is perfect for you! - RGA 05:47:20 06/30/12 (1)

Further thoughts on reviews - JerryS 08:29:33 06/30/12 (0)

RE: Critics being critical: 10 Audio pans the Krell S-275 - Eric B 19:09:06 06/15/12 (17)

RE: Critics being critical: 10 Audio pans the Krell S-275 - RGA 20:47:25 06/15/12 (16)

Context - JerryS 09:53:02 06/30/12 (0)

RE: Critics being critical: 10 Audio pans the Krell S-275 - Eric B 21:12:00 06/15/12 (14)

RE: Critics being critical: 10 Audio pans the Krell S-275 - mkuller 14:28:34 06/16/12 (11)

RE: Critics being critical: 10 Audio pans the Krell S-275 - Eric B 23:57:03 06/18/12 (10)

RE: Critics being critical: 10 Audio pans the Krell S-275 - RGA 19:36:23 06/19/12 (9)

RE: Critics being critical: 10 Audio pans the Krell S-275 - Eric B 23:13:03 06/19/12 (8)

And you remind me... - mkuller 10:54:50 06/22/12 (6)

RE: And you remind me... - Eric B 13:21:07 06/22/12 (5)

That would be... - mkuller 16:07:14 06/22/12 (4)

RE: That would be... - Eric B 21:02:14 06/22/12 (3)

Unprovoked? - mkuller 21:09:22 06/22/12 (2)

RE: Unprovoked? - Eric B 22:12:19 06/22/12 (1)

Why is your... - mkuller 09:44:33 06/23/12 (0)

RE: Critics being critical: 10 Audio pans the Krell S-275 - RGA 02:09:28 06/20/12 (0)

RE: Critics being critical: 10 Audio pans the Krell S-275 - RGA 23:55:47 06/15/12 (1)

RE: Critics being critical: 10 Audio pans the Krell S-275 - Frihed89 23:59:28 06/18/12 (0)

RE: Critics being critical: 10 Audio pans the Krell S-275 - Bob Rex 10:36:14 06/15/12 (0)

Since D'agostino is gone, you have to wonder about the engineering talent and vision there.... - viridian 12:00:36 06/14/12 (2)

Personally the 'Krell which is just some old failed marantz is what I thought sucks - Elizabeth 14:20:07 06/14/12 (1)

RE: Personally the 'Krell which is just some old failed marantz is what I thought sucks - zako 18:56:38 06/14/12 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: 10 Audio is an excellent example of why reveiwers should not write bad reviews. - bjh 10:50:28 06/25/12 (6)

RE: 10 Audio is an excellent example of why reveiwers should not write bad reviews. - Ralph 12:33:07 06/25/12 (5)

RE: 10 Audio is an excellent example of why reveiwers should not write bad reviews. - bjh 12:41:20 06/25/12 (4)

My advice to you would be to learn some manners - Pinkus 11:19:02 06/26/12 (3)

It has now been pointed out to him that the "Stereophile reviewer (Steven Stone)" who panned his preamp - bjh 09:42:09 06/27/12 (2)

This stuff is all a matter of public record. - Ralph 13:11:11 06/28/12 (1)

RE: This stuff is all a matter of public record. - Cpk 14:57:42 06/28/12 (0)

Post a Message!