RE: Well done

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - JV Breaks a Metphor? Need Help From the Left Coast (and Zither Players) - Charles Hansen 00:12:44 04/25/12 (116)

You all make me want to quit - kev313 19:35:06 04/30/12 (2)

Valid points, mostly - Charles Hansen 05:37:11 05/02/12 (1)

Valid points, mostly - jamesgarvin 08:26:07 05/02/12 (0)

the record he refers to is excellent sonically - ruxtonvet 19:39:59 04/29/12 (0)

Welcome back , Charles - Beetlemania 21:21:50 04/26/12 (12)

RE: Welcome back , Charles - JNS 13:04:27 05/01/12 (8)

RE: Welcome back , Charles - Beetlemania 21:49:09 05/01/12 (0)

RE: Welcome back , Charles - Charles Hansen 17:05:50 05/01/12 (6)

RE: Welcome back , Charles - JNS 19:11:20 05/01/12 (5)

RE: Welcome back , Charles - Beetlemania 21:52:23 05/01/12 (4)

RE: Welcome back , Charles - JNS 21:31:22 05/02/12 (3)

Strongly disagree - Beetlemania 07:23:53 05/03/12 (2)

RE: Strongly disagree - Mike Mc 20:08:28 05/03/12 (1)

RE: Strongly disagree - Mike Mc 22:57:52 05/03/12 (0)

that kind of - hifitommy 19:11:18 04/29/12 (2)

you may be - hifitommy 20:02:34 04/30/12 (0)

Uhh... - Charles Hansen 19:06:23 04/30/12 (0)

That Zither Player - Tobias 18:46:55 04/26/12 (0)

TAS has become... - mkuller 11:22:24 04/26/12 (3)

So what do you really think? :) - E-Stat 14:16:33 04/26/12 (2)

Any word... - mkuller 12:14:52 04/27/12 (1)

RE: Any word... - E-Stat 12:22:29 04/27/12 (0)

RE: JV Breaks a Metphor? Need Help From the Left Coast (and Zither Players) - tomservo 10:02:40 04/26/12 (1)

Thanks, Tom! (NT) - Charles Hansen 12:10:06 04/26/12 (0)

RE: JV Breaks a Metphor? Need Help From the Left Coast (and Zither Players) - bjh 17:47:33 04/25/12 (0)

RE: JV Breaks a Metphor? Need Help From the Left Coast (and Zither Players) - John Atkinson 14:23:22 04/25/12 (1)

Good try... - Charles Hansen 22:08:46 04/25/12 (0)

RE: JV Breaks a Metphor? Need Help From the Left Coast (and Zither Players) - jamesgarvin 10:59:56 04/25/12 (7)

Good points, all -- thanks. (NT) - Charles Hansen 22:11:40 04/25/12 (0)

“Falsus in unum, falsus in omnibus” - Tony Lauck 19:02:33 04/25/12 (4)

RE: “Falsus in unum, falsus in omnibus” - jamesgarvin 20:22:22 04/25/12 (3)

57 - Tony Lauck 08:15:39 04/26/12 (1)

One for each state!!! LOL! (nt) - mkuller 21:07:57 04/29/12 (0)

" I'd give Fremer a pass" ... Yeah same here ... as for his editor ... a fail I'm afraid :) nt - bjh 20:29:44 04/25/12 (0)

RE: JV Breaks a Metphor? Need Help From the Left Coast (and Zither Players) - asikhs 18:50:02 04/25/12 (0)

Dunno 'bout zithers, but there are not any "currents" within a violin's body - John Marks 10:10:08 04/25/12 (1)

You sure 'bout that? - Charles Hansen 21:56:15 04/25/12 (0)

Seriously? That's what you got? - Enophile 08:15:47 04/25/12 (54)

RE: Seriously? That's what you got? - Doug Schneider 13:43:31 04/25/12 (0)

RE: Seriously? That's what you got? - Charles Hansen 09:13:42 04/25/12 (46)

Your post reminded me of one I wrote here several years ago... - ecl876 08:06:21 04/29/12 (0)

RE: Seriously? That's what you got? - Bill the K 20:26:21 04/25/12 (1)

OK... - Charles Hansen 21:47:42 04/25/12 (0)

RE: Seriously? That's what you got? - JNS 15:23:26 04/25/12 (36)

RE: Seriously? That's what you got? - tmsorosk 05:15:35 05/10/12 (0)

RE: Seriously? That's what you got? - Bill the K 01:40:12 04/27/12 (1)

RE: Seriously? That's what you got? - JNS 16:08:10 04/28/12 (0)

RE: Seriously? That's what you got? - audio39 04:05:56 04/26/12 (0)

Hmmm - Charles Hansen 21:54:34 04/25/12 (31)

RE: Hmmm - JNS 15:58:41 04/28/12 (0)

TAS’s Little League Mentality - regmac 08:14:43 04/26/12 (28)

The thing I don't understand - Charles Hansen 12:18:23 04/26/12 (27)

Perhaps you can shed some light... - regmac 14:13:55 04/26/12 (26)

RE: Perhaps you can shed some light... - Charles Hansen 16:14:04 04/26/12 (25)

RE: Perhaps you can shed some light... - John Atkinson 08:33:29 04/27/12 (24)

RE: Perhaps you can shed some light... - josh358 20:05:28 04/28/12 (8)

RE: Perhaps you can shed some light... - John Atkinson 05:21:58 04/29/12 (7)

Thanks for making me smile John, more relaxed like those days in the early 90's.~nT - Cleantimestream 17:32:10 05/09/12 (0)

RE: Perhaps you can shed some light... - Bill the K 19:53:26 04/30/12 (1)

Is there a direct relationship between.... - audio39 07:12:50 05/01/12 (0)

RE: Perhaps you can shed some light... - Cpk 05:10:04 04/30/12 (0)

RE: Perhaps you can shed some light... - josh358 07:38:09 04/29/12 (2)

RE: Perhaps you can shed some light... - John Atkinson 11:55:35 04/29/12 (1)

RE: Perhaps you can shed some light... - josh358 16:22:52 04/30/12 (0)

Interesting... - Neil49 04:28:31 04/28/12 (14)

Michael Fremer figured this out - Charles Hansen 17:32:01 04/29/12 (9)

RE: Michael Fremer figured this out - Tony Lauck 20:02:17 04/30/12 (8)

Why dismiss Consumer Reports - Bill the K 08:59:44 05/01/12 (7)

RE: Why dismiss Consumer Reports - Tony Lauck 13:24:46 05/01/12 (0)

If it were not for Ralph Nader... - Jim Austin 11:55:40 05/01/12 (5)

Sample to Sample - Bill the K 20:04:51 05/01/12 (4)

RE: Sample to Sample - Jim Austin 04:44:07 05/02/12 (3)

Just for you, JA - Charles Hansen 05:07:11 05/02/12 (2)

Thanks Charles - Jim Austin 05:39:08 05/02/12 (1)

Value Engineering - Tony Lauck 12:08:46 05/02/12 (0)

RE: Interesting... - RGA 11:16:22 04/28/12 (2)

RE: Interesting... - BubbaMike 14:39:13 04/28/12 (1)

RE: Interesting... - RGA 22:30:04 04/28/12 (0)

RE: Interesting... - John Atkinson 08:08:23 04/28/12 (0)

Interesting candor. -nt - soulfood 04:30:41 04/26/12 (0)

"Is this also true for the rest of the review?" For any reviewer (as in any) there is only one way to answer.. - Enophile 09:31:12 04/25/12 (5)

RE: "Is this also true for the rest of the review?" For any reviewer (as in any) there is only one way to answer.. - Charles Hansen 21:45:44 04/25/12 (4)

RE: "Is this also true for the rest of the review?" For any reviewer (as in any) there is only one way to answer.. - josh358 19:34:43 04/28/12 (0)

Didnt you make a comment in print about Regas DAC? - Kloss 13:00:02 04/26/12 (1)

RE: Didnt you make a comment in print about Regas DAC? - Charles Hansen 16:24:08 04/26/12 (0)

Woah! Stop the virtual press! There's something in TAS you WON'T comment on? - Enophile 07:35:18 04/26/12 (0)

RE: yep - Cpk 09:00:34 04/25/12 (5)

Well it must be said that your posts in the CA are illuminating, ... - bjh 18:18:58 04/25/12 (1)

RE: I see the detritus has washed in - Cpk 19:26:24 04/25/12 (0)

RE: yep - Charles Hansen 09:25:29 04/25/12 (2)

RE: yep - Cpk 10:25:16 04/25/12 (1)

Fair enough. (NT) - Charles Hansen 21:38:51 04/25/12 (0)

Well done - Metralla 05:53:44 04/25/12 (23)

RE: Well done - jvalin@cinci.rr.com 10:07:37 04/26/12 (22)

We report, you decide - Charles Hansen 15:30:22 04/26/12 (0)

RE: Well done - Brian Cheney 12:58:33 04/26/12 (20)

RE: Well done - jvalin@cinci.rr.com 13:17:22 04/26/12 (19)

"his small circle of fanboys just chime in in agreement " - Metralla 19:36:12 04/26/12 (2)

Delicious irony - Beetlemania 21:11:24 04/26/12 (0)

RE: "his small circle of fanboys just chime in in agreement " - jvalin@cinci.rr.com 19:53:07 04/26/12 (0)

RE: Well done - Tony Lauck 17:50:46 04/26/12 (14)

RE: Well done - Mike Mc 22:33:54 04/26/12 (0)

RE: Well done - jvalin@cinci.rr.com 19:46:04 04/26/12 (12)

RE: Well done - Tony Lauck 21:13:01 04/26/12 (11)

RE: Well done - jvalin@cinci.rr.com 21:32:23 04/26/12 (9)

RE: Well done - JNS 13:10:31 05/01/12 (0)

RE: Well done - Tony Lauck 22:20:28 04/26/12 (7)

RE: Well done - soulfood 06:54:57 04/27/12 (6)

RE: Well done - Tony Lauck 07:25:19 04/27/12 (5)

RE: Well done - soulfood 09:05:57 04/27/12 (4)

RE: Well done - Tony Lauck 10:41:24 04/27/12 (3)

RE: Well done - soulfood 11:26:24 04/27/12 (2)

RE: Well done - Tony Lauck 12:18:56 04/27/12 (1)

RE: Well done - soulfood 13:25:00 04/27/12 (0)

RE: Well done - jvalin@cinci.rr.com 21:28:26 04/26/12 (0)

RE: Well done - soulfood 15:25:06 04/26/12 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: Well done - jvalin@cinci.rr.com 19:46:04 04/26/12 (12)

RE: Well done - Tony Lauck 21:13:01 04/26/12 (11)

RE: Well done - jvalin@cinci.rr.com 21:32:23 04/26/12 (9)

RE: Well done - JNS 13:10:31 05/01/12 (0)

RE: Well done - Tony Lauck 22:20:28 04/26/12 (7)

RE: Well done - soulfood 06:54:57 04/27/12 (6)

RE: Well done - Tony Lauck 07:25:19 04/27/12 (5)

RE: Well done - soulfood 09:05:57 04/27/12 (4)

RE: Well done - Tony Lauck 10:41:24 04/27/12 (3)

RE: Well done - soulfood 11:26:24 04/27/12 (2)

RE: Well done - Tony Lauck 12:18:56 04/27/12 (1)

RE: Well done - soulfood 13:25:00 04/27/12 (0)

RE: Well done - jvalin@cinci.rr.com 21:28:26 04/26/12 (0)

Post a Message!