In Reply to: RE: The audio odysseys of professional reviewers posted by RGA on February 3, 2012 at 19:22:43:
OK.
Guess I was thinking of receivers more of my vintage. In them thar days they were just integrated amps with tuners and of course their sound quality varied but many were quite good, even some cheap ones.
But I can relate to what you are saying. On a lark I bought a Sony "home theater" style receiver for $20 at a garage sale as I was walking back home from the C-store a few years ago thinking I might use it for sound if I was working on my system. They said it worked and it does but I've only listened to it enough to verify that so I really don't know how it "sounds". But it certainly doesn't LOOK promising. So I'm biased too even though my experience is that looks are not very predictive of performance.
I don't know what "pure class A" means, what's an example of "impure class A"?
Regards, Rick
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: The audio odysseys of professional reviewers - rick_m 09:00:09 02/04/12 (2)
- RE: The audio odysseys of professional reviewers - Tony Lauck 17:36:04 02/04/12 (1)
- RE: The audio odysseys of professional reviewers - rick_m 08:47:05 02/05/12 (0)