In Reply to: Over on the goN is a question: Why is there no Stereophile review of Magnepan 3.7? posted by Elizabeth on July 25, 2011 at 13:06:53:
>The question has raised some interesting points about TAS and Streophile.
>So what say you Stereophile mavens?
We have asked for review samples but Magnepan's Wendell Diller is
concerned that if i measured the speaker, the measurements would unveil
proprietary information. Not a problem with The Absolute Sound, of course. :-)
John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Over on the goN is a question: Why is there no Stereophile review of Magnepan 3.7? - John Atkinson 13:56:16 07/25/11 (44)
- RE: Over on the goN is a question: Why is there no Stereophile review of Magnepan 3.7? - Jallen 22:12:49 08/02/11 (0)
- In your opinion, is that a valid concern? - jihad 12:54:54 07/31/11 (0)
- RE: Over on the goN is a question: Why is there no Stereophile review of Magnepan 3.7? - ahendler 20:39:34 07/26/11 (0)
- RE: Over on the goN is a question: Why is there no Stereophile review of Magnepan 3.7? - sailor321 09:30:40 07/26/11 (1)
- RE: Over on the goN is a question: Why is there no Stereophile review of Magnepan 3.7? - josh358 18:11:09 08/06/11 (0)
- RE: Over on the goN is a question: Why is there no Stereophile review of Magnepan 3.7? - rmilewsk 23:43:11 07/25/11 (20)
- RE: Over on the goN is a question: Why is there no Stereophile review of Magnepan 3.7? - John Atkinson 15:45:21 07/26/11 (19)
- RE: Over on the goN is a question: Why is there no Stereophile review of Magnepan 3.7? - DrChaos 14:30:39 07/30/11 (7)
- RE: Over on the goN is a question: Why is there no Stereophile review of Magnepan 3.7? - josh358 18:20:33 08/06/11 (0)
- they can't do that... - Tom Schuman 09:40:36 08/02/11 (0)
- RE: Over on the goN is a question: Why is there no Stereophile review of Magnepan 3.7? - John Atkinson 00:24:06 07/31/11 (4)
- RE: Over on the goN is a question: Why is there no Stereophile review of Magnepan 3.7? - tmsorosk 06:25:02 07/31/11 (3)
- RE: Over on the goN is a question: Why is there no Stereophile review of Magnepan 3.7? - josh358 18:15:51 08/06/11 (2)
- RE: Over on the goN is a question: Why is there no Stereophile review of Magnepan 3.7? - tmsorosk 18:23:09 08/06/11 (1)
- RE: Over on the goN is a question: Why is there no Stereophile review of Magnepan 3.7? - josh358 18:37:22 08/06/11 (0)
- Dispersion? - Mike in NJ 19:34:11 07/26/11 (9)
- RE: Dispersion? - RGA 21:26:43 07/26/11 (8)
- RE: Dispersion? - josh358 18:23:42 08/06/11 (0)
- Totally agree...if I love the sound of one of my components... - Steve Parry 13:01:09 08/01/11 (4)
- RE: Totally agree...if I love the sound of one of my components... - RGA 10:37:06 08/03/11 (3)
- RE: Totally agree...if I love the sound of one of my components... - josh358 18:31:57 08/06/11 (0)
- Cerwin Vega CSL215 over 20.1? - MaggieLover 22:27:39 08/04/11 (1)
- RE: Cerwin Vega CSL215 over 20.1? - RGA 14:29:24 08/05/11 (0)
- RE: Dispersion? - DrChaos 14:31:34 07/30/11 (0)
- Who cares what reviewers buy? - Pat D 08:20:50 07/27/11 (0)
- RE: Over on the goN is a question: Why is there no Stereophile review of Magnepan 3.7? - audiojon 17:41:00 07/26/11 (0)
- "measurements would unveil proprietary information." - Daverz 22:30:35 07/25/11 (12)
- RE: "measurements would unveil proprietary information." - MaggieLover 23:28:11 07/26/11 (4)
- RE: "measurements would unveil proprietary information." - Pat D 08:13:47 07/27/11 (3)
- "post at Audioholics" - good for a chuckle. - carcass93 13:45:25 07/27/11 (2)
- RE: "post at Audioholics" - good for a chuckle. - MaggieLover 15:43:20 07/27/11 (1)
- RE: "post at Audioholics" - good for a chuckle. - Pat D 08:08:30 07/30/11 (0)
- Hey...looking... - mkuller 16:21:52 07/26/11 (6)
- We have a winner! - andy_c 20:51:24 07/26/11 (1)
- RE: We have a winner! - josh358 18:41:02 08/06/11 (0)
- RE: Hey...looking... - tmsorosk 16:47:13 07/26/11 (3)
- They ain't "stats." (NT) - Kal Rubinson 20:48:57 07/26/11 (2)
- RE: They ain't "stats." (NT) - tmsorosk 04:46:14 07/27/11 (1)
- RE: They ain't "stats." (NT) - Pat D 07:50:22 07/27/11 (0)
- Just buy a pair and then measure them. - DustyC 19:39:41 07/25/11 (0)
- Yes. - Kal Rubinson 15:51:30 07/25/11 (2)
- What's that mean? Your column would be ok due to lack of measurements? nt - Rick W 18:34:07 07/25/11 (1)
- "You might say that. I could not possibly comment." (NT) - Kal Rubinson 19:03:04 07/25/11 (0)
- Cool. nt - Elizabeth 14:47:28 07/25/11 (0)