Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Stereophile's Manufacturers' Showcase: "Advertising" vs "Advertising" - Steve Eddy 11:47:21 06/04/10 (27)

• I think your counter example reads more like a press release than yours - keith_d 21:08:20 06/04/10 (3)
• Sure it does, but it's also more "advertising" than mine... - Steve Eddy 21:44:56 06/04/10 (2)
• But I would have not run it on a style basis - keith_d 10:16:58 06/05/10 (0)
• Their forum. Their rules. - Dave Pogue 05:15:57 06/05/10 (0)
• RE: Stereophile's Manufacturers' Showcase: "Advertising" vs "Advertising" - Stephen Mejias 12:54:55 06/04/10 (1)
• RE: Stereophile's Manufacturers' Showcase: "Advertising" vs "Advertising" - Steve Eddy 14:47:03 06/04/10 (0)
• RE: Stereophile's Manufacturers' Showcase: "Advertising" vs "Advertising" - Ralph 12:42:02 06/04/10 (20)
• RE: Stereophile's Manufacturers' Showcase: "Advertising" vs "Advertising" - JNS 16:44:33 06/04/10 (1)
• RE: Stereophile's Manufacturers' Showcase: "Advertising" vs "Advertising" - Ralph 17:14:51 06/04/10 (0)
• RE: Stereophile's Manufacturers' Showcase: "Advertising" vs "Advertising" - Steve Eddy 14:53:54 06/04/10 (17)
• RE: OK- if its the one in the link I provided then now I am with you! - Ralph 17:12:43 06/04/10 (16)
• That's the one. Welcome aboard. :-) nt - Steve Eddy 18:40:19 06/04/10 (15)
• Pure advertising. - robert young 06:46:07 06/05/10 (14)
• RE: Pure advertising. - Steve Eddy 07:50:05 06/05/10 (13)
• Pure advertising. Emphasis on "pure." - robert young 09:16:48 06/05/10 (6)
• RE: Pure advertising. Emphasis on "pure." - Steve Eddy 09:39:20 06/05/10 (5)
• now you're being disingenuous. - robert young 09:57:20 06/05/10 (4)
• RE: now you're being disingenuous. - Steve Eddy 10:49:07 06/05/10 (3)
• OK, I'll try one more time. - robert young 11:28:23 06/05/10 (2)
• RE: OK, I'll try one more time. - Steve Eddy 11:59:58 06/05/10 (1)
• RE: OK, I'll try one more time. - robert young 13:43:39 06/05/10 (0)
• You could say something about the very fine gauge wire used - Metralla 08:06:26 06/05/10 (5)
• Sure, but... - Steve Eddy 08:25:03 06/05/10 (4)
• 'explained on the "details" on the website' - Metralla 09:10:21 06/05/10 (3)
• RE: 'explained on the "details" on the website' - Steve Eddy 09:44:04 06/05/10 (2)
• "not going to waste my time writing anything different" - Ruh roh, who has the axe to grind now? nt - keith_d 16:21:41 06/05/10 (0)
• I read a lot of press releases. - Kal Rubinson 15:16:19 06/05/10 (0)

Follow Ups

• RE: OK- if its the one in the link I provided then now I am with you! - Ralph 17:12:43 06/04/10 (16)
• That's the one. Welcome aboard. :-) nt - Steve Eddy 18:40:19 06/04/10 (15)
• Pure advertising. - robert young 06:46:07 06/05/10 (14)
• RE: Pure advertising. - Steve Eddy 07:50:05 06/05/10 (13)
• Pure advertising. Emphasis on "pure." - robert young 09:16:48 06/05/10 (6)
• RE: Pure advertising. Emphasis on "pure." - Steve Eddy 09:39:20 06/05/10 (5)
• now you're being disingenuous. - robert young 09:57:20 06/05/10 (4)
• RE: now you're being disingenuous. - Steve Eddy 10:49:07 06/05/10 (3)
• OK, I'll try one more time. - robert young 11:28:23 06/05/10 (2)
• RE: OK, I'll try one more time. - Steve Eddy 11:59:58 06/05/10 (1)
• RE: OK, I'll try one more time. - robert young 13:43:39 06/05/10 (0)
• You could say something about the very fine gauge wire used - Metralla 08:06:26 06/05/10 (5)
• Sure, but... - Steve Eddy 08:25:03 06/05/10 (4)
• 'explained on the "details" on the website' - Metralla 09:10:21 06/05/10 (3)
• RE: 'explained on the "details" on the website' - Steve Eddy 09:44:04 06/05/10 (2)
• "not going to waste my time writing anything different" - Ruh roh, who has the axe to grind now? nt - keith_d 16:21:41 06/05/10 (0)
• I read a lot of press releases. - Kal Rubinson 15:16:19 06/05/10 (0)