70.194.175.61
| '); } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } // End --> |
In Reply to: RE: OK, first let us define "accuracy" . . . posted by RGA on October 18, 2009 at 13:59:38
the way you explain "accuracy". It either is or it isn't. Instead, we get:
more neutral,
less,
closer to,
on one side or the other of neutral,
almost,
etc.
"Apparently, people now believe that mental telepathy is the foundation of communication and magic is the source of daily events. Consequently, we no longer have to participate in our own lives."
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup: