Critic's Corner

OK, first let us define "accuracy" . . .

66.178.144.234


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] Thread: [ Display  All  Email ] [ Critic's Corner ]

. . . as the most lifelike possible reproduction of the original recorded sonic event.

This has been the stated goal of hi-fi from the outset, and one to which many dedicted engineers and manufacturers have devoted their entire careers.

Perhaps it doesn't "exist" in an absolute sense (what does?), since we have not reached the point where the reproduced sound is utterly indistinguishable from the original, but the industry has come incrementally closer to this ideal since its inception, and has certainly come a LONG way from Edison's windup phonograph!

If accuracy does not "exist" as a worthy goal, why have so MANY designers of everytning from microphones to studio consoles to recording/mastering/disc pressing equipment to playback sources (analog or digital) to pre/power amplifiers to speakers worked so HARD, for so LONG, to maximize bandwidth, flatness of frequency response, and dynamic range, while minimizing distortion and noise? Why is there even an Audio Engineering Society? Why aren't we all still listening to Edison phonographs?

Follow Ups:


Post a Followup:

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] Thread: [ Display  All  Email ] [ Critic's Corner ]
[ Comment ] [ Edit ] [ Delete ] [ Copyright Warning! Click for Details ]