Critic's Corner

RE: Not exactly unprecedented

24.99.198.15

In Reply to: RE: Not exactly unprecedented posted by bjh on May 22, 2008 at 11:56:18

Not going to get into another roll in the mud with you, bjh ... you introduced a nonsequitur into the first treatment of the issue, and it seems like you're reintroducing it now. The issue is not and never was about Stereophile's policies ... it was and remains an issue about TAS' policies.
"Your theory is crazy, but it's not crazy enough to be true." - Niels Bohr

Follow Ups:

RE: Not exactly unprecedented - bjh 12:16:51 05/22/08 (3)
- RE: Not exactly unprecedented - Sommovigo 12:31:10 05/22/08 (2)
  - Oh my? - bjh 12:48:20 05/22/08 (1)
    - Oy Vey. nt - Sommovigo 13:00:11 05/22/08 (0)

Post a Followup:

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

To view your new posting or follow-up, click on the RELOAD or REFRESH button on your browser.