192.254.30.2
In Reply to: RE: Imitation, Flattery, Whatever - Part 2 posted by das@soundstage.com on April 13, 2008 at 14:00:15
I ran out to my car to check the camera because I was sure I had the same photo in my camera. But I had stepped across the street to try to get the FSI sign in the pic, so no cathedral and a lousy shot comparatively. In my mind's eye, I had exactly the photo in question. So then we ask if one group saw the first photo on a blog and went out to duplicate it, or if it was coincidence (It would be funny if a search of the originals showed one photographer in the other picture, or perhaps Mr. Darby was holding RD's beer).
This topic started with a conceptual question over a reviewer being unbiased if they are also a reviewee. It continues with the deeper issue of overall integrity. So now similar photos are assumed infringement until proven otherwise based on past infrigement. More than anything this highlights the slippery slope of all press and just how careful they must be to avoid even the appearance of inpropriety.
We should take a moment to laud the magazines that have passed muster on numerous challenges, Stereophile, TAS, Soundstage, 6moons, and others. Integrity is a tough title to reclaim. Perhaps we better understand the narrow road they tread.
It is unfortunate that publicity is simply that, pubilicity. So Mr. Darby's magazine shows ten times the hits this month, he sells that to his advertisers. Not fair.
P
My speaker building site
Follow Ups: