24.16.196.177
In Reply to: RE: but still... posted by Constantine Soo on July 17, 2007 at 15:13:27
however, and this is probably irritating to you by now, i am still fixated on your original comment and still don't understand it -
mono leaves you "craving for air, dimensionality of instruments, extension of frequencies". i understand from your above response how mono would leave you craving soundstage/instrument positioning as you say, but not the relationship to frequency extension,etc.
additionally, i am looking to clarify this statement -
'If we all listen to mono, there would be no need for the drive in developing more exacting drivers, more efficient speakers and amplifiers, the least compressed software and front-end equipment'
not sure again how listening in mono would obviate the need for better hardware and software.
Follow Ups: