|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
|
|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
In Reply to: Re: It took you a while but... posted by unclestu52 on May 9, 2007 at 11:59:26:
Well, obviously the industry does, both on recording and on playback side, maybe because there is not enough convincing evidence (normal music played through low-distortion, time-coherent speakers in domestic listening environment). I agree, keeping polarity the same throughout the recording procedure is being accurate to the original signal, it doesn't do any harm so why not have a polarity standard.But by the same token one could speaker manufacturers to build time-coherent speakers only. The difference is audible, albeit subtle, and time-coherence is the only way to accurately reproduce a signal, it doesn't do any harm, so why not?
Apparently no one cares, When Dr. Heyser was president of AES, that would have been the very moment for Clark to try and get a peer-reviewed paper on the subject published. Did he ever try?
Klaus
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: The answer is not to accept the status quo - KlausR. 00:14:56 05/10/07 (5)
- "When Dr. Heyser was president of AES, that would have been the very moment for Clark." ROTFLOL! - clarkjohnsen 09:28:29 05/11/07 (4)
- Actually, I didn't do a search on that one, but... - KlausR. 00:02:24 05/12/07 (3)
- Nor have you much searched the Wood effect -- that's the whole problem. - clarkjohnsen 10:10:02 05/12/07 (2)
- Three questions, well, actually four - KlausR. 21:43:54 05/12/07 (1)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
