In Reply to: Of course, every review in TAS is a flattering one posted by TomLarson on March 18, 2007 at 09:39:10:
going back to the gilmore speaker review, they said it was a work-in-progress. thats not exactly a rave. the mark of a good review is that it recognizes the good AND bad points of the product.i dont understand you guys that are sure there is a conspiracy. we can ALL go out and hear the products for the most part. sure, some live in more remote areas but still, for pricey products, they must be heard in person and preferably in your own listening environment.
if i lived in roadapple KY, i would have to be willing to pay shipping and restocking fees if i wasnt comfortable with keeping a component. those of us that do live in a city where most of what we might want is accessible pay the price of living in the city and its negative forces along with enjoying the conveniences associated with the urban setting.
we are not bound to believe everything we read.
...regards...tr
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- not really - hifitommy 19:43:56 03/18/07 (3)
- Re: not really - TomLarson 12:52:34 03/19/07 (2)
- Only Kennedy? You're missing out on some big ones...(nt) - mkuller 14:24:33 03/21/07 (1)
- All the others have had explanations I buy with no conspiricies... nt - TomLarson 18:44:13 03/23/07 (0)