In Reply to: Re: Perhaps you ought to re-read your own last paragraph. posted by andy19191 on March 2, 2007 at 03:34:43:
You seem intent on not explaining yourself. But the effort to get you to try bores me, so I'll only comment on one "point" you've made:"> You are clearly stating that you Stereophile is anti science, or at the least,
> pseudo-scientific.Indee but why should this be a problem to you as a subjectivist?"
Well, to borrow some of your technique, I'll ask you a question: what makes you so sure I'm a "subjectivist??" That I don't find JA's approach to equipment reviewing to be "pseudo-science" has nothing to do with being a subjectivist or an objectivist. And it should be a "problem to" me because I find your comments to be untrue. You have based your opinions on a complete lack of knowledge (kind of unscientific of you, isn't it?).
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- You continue to obfuscate... - robert young 12:16:55 03/04/07 (0)