In Reply to: Re: Big deefferance'... posted by andy19191 on March 1, 2007 at 13:59:28:
Aczel is deaf, anyone reading his foolishness can tell as much.That you don't seem cognizant of that fact, or at least you comments suggest as much, doesn't bother me. To be honest I suspect your ignorance is more likely than not due to your being deaf as well... in the sense of not having developed a discerning listening facility.
ps.
OH, that he actually returned to publishing after his serious ethical affront is in and of itself more than adequate a reason to shun the man, why anyone would even bother debating that point is simply beyond me; thought were I forced to speculate I would suggest a deficit of sound ethics on the part of his defenders.
No Guru, No Method, No Teacher
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Big deefferance'... - bjh 14:29:57 03/01/07 (0)