In Reply to: Re: Almost correct posted by andy19191 on March 1, 2007 at 10:18:02:
...between Stereophile and The Audio Critic that, as a professed 'non-audiophile' and 'audiophile critic' may escape you.Stereophile is a paragon of ethics and is also commercially successful. It has never claimed to be a 'scientific journal'.
Their reviews are based on 'observational listening' and most follow with 'scientific' measurements.
Aczel, on the other hand, is very arrogant and unethical (search 'Fourier Speaker' for details) and The Audio Critic is a commercial failure.
That you prefer Aczel's brand of yellow journalism and pseudoscience does not surprise me.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Big deefferance'... - mkuller 13:17:29 03/01/07 (11)
- Re: Big deefferance'... - andy19191 13:59:28 03/01/07 (10)
- Perhaps you ought to re-read your own last paragraph. - robert young 15:15:17 03/01/07 (5)
- Re: Perhaps you ought to re-read your own last paragraph. - andy19191 03:34:43 03/02/07 (1)
- You continue to obfuscate... - robert young 12:16:55 03/04/07 (0)
- Re: Perhaps you ought to re-read your own last paragraph. - bjh 17:46:26 03/01/07 (2)
- You mean Pat-D-Cake? -t - Bruce Kendall 19:06:11 03/01/07 (1)
- :) nt - bjh 19:09:58 03/01/07 (1)
- So which DID you prefer? - mkuller 15:13:31 03/01/07 (2)
- Re: So which DID you prefer? - andy19191 00:35:57 03/02/07 (1)
- Not much in a long, long time... - mkuller 10:07:11 03/02/07 (0)
- Re: Big deefferance'... - bjh 14:29:57 03/01/07 (0)