In Reply to: Why so much trashing of Stereophile? posted by nightdoggy on January 14, 2007 at 08:14:11:
...it's because JA and some of the writers read posts here and will respond to the trolls.If HP or TAS writers did, TAS would be getting criticized a lot more.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- That's easy... - mkuller 10:21:48 01/14/07 (18)
- Re: That's easy... - TomLarson 15:20:22 01/14/07 (6)
- Stereophile has about twice the circulation of TAS...(nt) - mkuller 12:53:22 01/15/07 (1)
- Come again? (nt) - Dave Pogue 18:00:14 01/14/07 (4)
- Re: Come again? (nt) - TomLarson 15:06:29 01/15/07 (2)
- Read your original post again, Tom :-) (nt) - Dave Pogue 16:15:36 01/15/07 (1)
- OOPS!!! (Thanks) nt - TomLarson 16:20:08 01/15/07 (0)
- The literary equivalent of an Escher impossible structure (nt) - E-Stat 20:09:55 01/14/07 (0)
- Don't forget the conspiracy buffs... - robert young 11:30:34 01/14/07 (9)
- Audio is no different than with other pursuits - E-Stat 12:02:57 01/14/07 (3)
- Yeah but Azcel is a rare bird thankfully - nightdoggy 13:12:57 01/14/07 (2)
- It's not worth it... - mkuller 13:00:55 01/15/07 (0)
- Re: Yeah but Azcel is a rare bird thankfully - TomLarson 15:21:25 01/14/07 (0)
- Re: Don't forget the conspiracy buffs... - TomLarson 11:51:21 01/14/07 (4)
- See? What did I tell y'all...(nt) - robert young 20:17:26 01/14/07 (3)
- Re: See? What did I tell y'all...(nt) - TomLarson 15:44:21 01/15/07 (2)
- Nice try, but...no. - robert young 16:40:58 01/15/07 (1)
- Not a nice try at all .... nt - TomLarson 11:41:11 01/16/07 (0)
- Good point (nt) - nightdoggy 11:00:52 01/14/07 (0)