In Reply to: Re: HiFI+ hope it stay the same posted by awsmone@hotmail.com on March 5, 2006 at 20:54:03:
> I get the impression, despite the excellent presentation that
> [HiFi+] was run on a shoestring budget...as Roy did all the
> editing himself I believe. Is it any different at Stereophile JA?
I wouldn't say Stereophile is run on a shoe-string budget. However,
we have just 4 full-time editorial staff: myself, music editor
Robert Baird, managing editor Elizabeth Donovan, and assistant
editor/forum moderator/blogger Stephen Mejias. I edit all the
non-music copy, after it has been copy-edited by a contractor.
John Atkinson
Editor, Stereophile
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Some data - John Atkinson 10:01:53 03/06/06 (12)
- The only area where TAS shits on Stereophile is in their music reviews - Shane from AUS 18:54:42 03/08/06 (6)
- Re: The only area where TAS shits on Stereophile is in their music reviews - Ozzie 19:50:21 03/12/06 (0)
- Re: The only area where TAS shits on Stereophile is in their music reviews - jim@signalpath 05:29:07 03/10/06 (4)
- Re: The only area where TAS shits on Stereophile is in their music reviews - Shane from AUS 13:02:05 03/10/06 (3)
- Re: The only area where TAS shits on Stereophile is in their music reviews - jim@signalpath 04:40:31 03/13/06 (2)
- Re: The only area where TAS shits on Stereophile is in their music reviews - theaudiohobby 10:19:55 03/13/06 (1)
- Re: The only area where TAS shits on Stereophile is in their music reviews - jim@signalpath 07:59:46 03/14/06 (0)
- Re: Some data - semuta 16:20:17 03/07/06 (0)
- Re: Some data - TomLarson 18:53:37 03/06/06 (3)
- Re: Some data - John Atkinson 04:17:32 03/07/06 (2)
- Re: Some data - TomLarson 06:23:09 03/07/06 (0)
- Thanks - awsmone@hotmail.com 04:30:49 03/07/06 (0)