You!!!! - garth - Critic's Corner

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Magazines and advertising - Stereophile example. - M3 lover 11:38:40 03/03/06 (75)

Why read any hobbyist magazines? - jamesgarvin 17:22:27 03/05/06 (0)

Buddy, no one gives a toss. (nt) - JohnL 15:03:15 03/05/06 (0)

What a waste of bandwidth. -t - bwkendall 10:46:21 03/05/06 (9)

What's required IMHO is ... - bjh 11:59:05 03/05/06 (1)

Hey, how about a new poll? - bwkendall 12:54:29 03/05/06 (0)

Yup - Sue Kraft 11:17:45 03/05/06 (6)

Except there are no wierd cat pics here...(nt) - mkuller 14:38:35 03/07/06 (0)

Re: Yup - bwkendall 12:53:21 03/05/06 (4)

rehashing these same issues over and over again... - Sue Kraft 13:24:19 03/05/06 (1)

No Sue, this thread is one that only occurs if - bwkendall 16:05:05 03/05/06 (0)

i would hope - hifitommy 13:13:38 03/05/06 (1)

Indeed. Repeat bullshit needs to go to Whiner's. -t - bwkendall 16:06:11 03/05/06 (0)

Re: Magazines and advertising - Stereophile example. - andy19191 09:54:57 03/05/06 (0)

Reviewers provide information - Frihed89 12:03:47 03/03/06 (5)

Re: Reviewers provide information - Robert Deutsch 13:52:21 03/03/06 (4)

Re: Reviewers provide information - TomLarson 16:09:36 03/03/06 (2)

Re: Reviewers provide information - Robert Deutsch 20:17:12 03/03/06 (1)

To state it explicitly, that might be exactly why there is no tension between you and JA. - Saul P 01:02:14 03/04/06 (0)

Then you either have - Frihed89 00:34:24 03/04/06 (0)

Hypothetically speaking - bwkendall 12:07:26 03/03/06 (3)

Re: My moniker - M3 lover 12:29:49 03/03/06 (2)

a guess - hifitommy 13:15:02 03/05/06 (0)

There I go being presumptious again. - bwkendall 12:36:26 03/03/06 (0)

Re: Magazines and advertising - Stereophile example. - Kal Rubinson 12:29:25 03/03/06 (3)

Re: Magazines and advertising - Stereophile example. - M3 lover 12:47:34 03/03/06 (2)

Re: Magazines and advertising - Stereophile example. - Peter Breuninger 15:27:55 03/05/06 (0)

Re: Magazines and advertising - Stereophile example. - Kal Rubinson 12:56:31 03/03/06 (0)

Hmmmâ€¦ - David Aiken 13:29:37 03/03/06 (0)

Two issues you raised... - mkuller 13:38:38 03/03/06 (1)

In agreement with mkuller and David Aiken - Enophile 13:51:45 03/03/06 (0)

Missing the point - lanny 13:48:10 03/03/06 (15)

Nonsense. - Kal Rubinson 13:57:06 03/03/06 (13)

Re: Nonsense. - middleground 15:37:43 03/03/06 (0)

Re: Nonsense. - TomLarson 16:07:01 03/03/06 (11)

No Nonsense Answer. - Kal Rubinson 16:40:23 03/03/06 (8)

Re: No Nonsense Answer. - TomLarson 18:41:15 03/03/06 (7)

What else did you expect? - Sean 19:53:35 03/03/06 (6)

Re: What else did you expect? - TomLarson 09:52:22 03/04/06 (2)

First meaning, of course. - Kal Rubinson 09:19:26 03/05/06 (1)

Re: First meaning, of course. - TomLarson 09:52:53 03/11/06 (0)

Re: What else did you expect? - John Atkinson 10:44:30 03/04/06 (2)

KR balances out ST...IMHO that is [nt] - Steve Cortez 16:32:13 03/04/06 (0)

A portion of the imbeciles on the Stereophile staff - Sean 19:29:33 03/04/06 (0)

Re: Nonsense. - Stephæn 17:05:26 03/03/06 (1)

Um...wasn't there Michael Mercer, after Scot? (nt) - Bill Leebens 18:29:05 03/30/06 (0)

Now I am wondering if you even read Stereophile. - bwkendall 14:34:34 03/03/06 (0)

"Like Products.' - timothywas1@comcast.net 15:00:44 03/03/06 (0)

Perhaps I could have made my point better . . . - M3 lover 16:27:52 03/03/06 (1)

Re: Perhaps I could have made my point better . . . - timothywas1@comcast.net 21:59:02 03/03/06 (0)

Re: Magazines and advertising - Stereophile example. - Woofer15 16:30:05 03/03/06 (0)

Perhaps all Audio Magz reviews should have a DISCLAIMER before every review... - Steve Cortez 22:39:42 03/03/06 (5)

Re: that is skirting the issue; does "St." want to be taken for... - Guy 04:19:22 03/04/06 (4)

Well, whether "they" like it or not, since it cost ~$1 an issue, its literally cheap entertainment :) [nt] - Steve Cortez 06:22:43 03/04/06 (3)

Re: Cute, but cheapness comes at a price (!) * - Guy 07:14:18 03/04/06 (2)

Okay... why don't you enlighten us... :) [nt] - Steve Cortez 18:19:36 03/04/06 (1)

Re: It'll cost you! * - Guy 18:25:33 03/04/06 (0)

Sigh... - John Atkinson 07:17:08 03/04/06 (11)

John, I believe you and a few others didn't read carefully. - M3 lover 08:25:51 03/04/06 (7)

DeVore: "New products from unknown companies." Hey! - clarkjohnsen 08:34:59 03/04/06 (0)

Enough already - John Atkinson 10:42:13 03/04/06 (5)

Who is being too sensitive here? - M3 lover 12:56:48 03/04/06 (4)

You!!!! - garth 14:11:19 03/04/06 (0)

Again, enough already! - John Atkinson 06:39:02 03/05/06 (2)

Don't worry John. A. , not everyone on here... - BJordan 10:55:39 03/05/06 (0)

It's the three month rule JA! - bwkendall 09:06:33 03/05/06 (0)

It never is an issue with you (NT) - Eric B 08:50:51 03/04/06 (1)

Because there is no connection...period. - John Atkinson 10:31:59 03/04/06 (0)

Re: How can you call any issue of your mag a "non-issue"? Hyprcrisy! (hee-hee) * - Guy 14:59:17 03/04/06 (0)

The biggest manufacturer of Electrons advertises in - bjh 08:13:59 03/04/06 (3)

Meanwhile, back on the audio ranch, - bwkendall 15:33:36 03/04/06 (2)

LOL!! (nt) - Eric B. 16:45:58 03/04/06 (0)

Blindfolded "chicken littles"? Gotta have controls ya' know! :) nt - bjh 16:53:54 03/04/06 (0)

WBT advertising and the WBT review.in Stereophile - Ray Kimber 11:39:18 03/04/06 (0)

if stereophile reviewed my product - blackwax@mac.com 20:31:23 03/04/06 (1)

Actually, if you think about it... why spend ad $ when you're already getting a positive review?... - Steve Cortez 21:43:27 03/04/06 (0)

Follow Ups

You!!!! - garth 14:11:19 03/04/06 (0)