Home
/
FAQ
/
News
Classifieds
/
Events
Critic's Corner
Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.
[
General
] [
Amp/Pre
] [
Speakers
] [
Hi-Eff
] [
Tubes
] [
SET
] [
OTL
] [
Tube/DIY
] [
Vinyl
] [
Cables
] [
Iso
] [
Tweaks/DIY
]
[
Critics
] [
Digital
] [
Hi-Rez
] [
DVD-A
] [
PC Audio
] [
Prop Head
] [
T
2
] [
Tape
] [
Tuners
] [
Vintage
] [
Music
] [
Hip Pop
] [
Rock
]
[
Video
] [
Films
] [
Pro
] [
Chat
] [
Reviews
] [
Inmate Systems
] [
Central
] [
Water Cooler
] [
Shady
] [
Gallery
] [
Search
]
More Asylums
Sponsored:
----------------
Audio Note Kits
Bastanis
Bottlehead
DIY HiFi
Dynaco
K&K Audio
Emerald Physics
MagneQuest
Planar Speakers
PS Audio
Room Acoustics
Signature Sound
myAsylum
----------------
Book Blvd.
Car Court
PC Place
Shutterbug Strasse
Wine Asylum
[
Asylum Support
] [
Post Message
] [
Forum Rules
]
Find:
Welcome! You must be a
registered Inmate
to post in this Asylum.
Be
civil and respectful
or be gone.
Page:
1
, . . . .
10
,
11
,
12
,
13
View:
Threads
eThreads
Sort:
Date
Update
Unanswered
Last:
Visit
24 Hours
48 Hours
Free Classifieds
FS: Sanus CF 55 rack -six shelves-very s...
- fwestern753
'); } // End -->
Enjoythemusic June issue.....
-
Ozzy
04:19:06 06/13/07
(
16
)
It seems like ETM is slipping and may morph into Audio Cafe.
-
howard
22:59:32 06/25/07
(1)
Stop fishing with insults.
-
Steven R. Rochlin
09:44:59 06/26/07
(0)
RE: Enjoythemusic June issue.....
-
Steven R. Rochlin
05:04:03 06/19/07
(0)
RE: Enjoythemusic June issue.....
-
Steven R. Rochlin
10:13:49 06/18/07
(
4
)
Pictures ain't reviews, Steve...
-
rlw
15:30:59 06/25/07
(0)
RE: Enjoythemusic June issue.....
-
Ozzy
11:59:33 06/18/07
(2)
RE: Enjoythemusic June issue.....
-
Steven R. Rochlin
15:59:24 06/18/07
(0)
That would be my priority list also NT
-
lancelot
13:33:19 06/18/07
(0)
RE: Enjoythemusic June issue.....
-
Sstone8807@aol.com
20:16:14 06/15/07
(0)
Begging your pardon, but...
-
clarkjohnsen
08:21:13 06/13/07
(
6
)
RE: Begging your pardon, but...
-
Steven R. Rochlin
10:24:25 06/18/07
(1)
Oh man, I can't let this one go...
-
rlw
15:35:44 06/25/07
(0)
Nope.....
-
Ozzy
11:03:32 06/13/07
(
3
)
I'd ask for my money back if I were you. ;-) nt
-
markrohr
12:51:06 06/14/07
(0)
All that free stuff, and yet... and yet... nt
-
clarkjohnsen
09:50:34 06/14/07
(0)
RE: Nope.....
-
Doc Gaw
09:30:06 06/14/07
(0)
Alls I know ...
-
Dr. S
10:34:38 06/09/07
(0)
6moons "Mortars into bricks"
-
KlausR.
01:46:29 06/06/07
(
103
)
Attention: Thread/t about to be hijacked -;)
-
Srajan Ebaen
06:23:17 06/20/07
(1)
RE: Attention: Thread/t about to be hijacked -;)
-
KlausR.
07:40:31 06/21/07
(0)
well 400 watts is 'about' 25 to 26dbw added to the K-horns number for db/w/1m gives
-
Timbo in Oz
16:29:08 06/14/07
(
6
)
Johnny-come-lately
-
Tom Brennan
11:59:44 06/15/07
(
5
)
RE: Johnny-come-lately
-
john.potis@comcast.net
13:13:26 06/15/07
(
4
)
RE: Johnny-come-lately
-
Tom Brennan
11:36:31 06/16/07
(
3
)
RE: Johnny-come-lately
-
john.potis@comcast.net
13:55:57 06/16/07
(2)
RE: Johnny-come-lately
-
Tom Brennan
16:33:57 06/16/07
(1)
RE: Johnny-come-lately
-
john.potis@comcast.net
17:11:46 06/16/07
(0)
112 dB!?!
-
mhardy6647
08:27:13 06/14/07
(
9
)
RE: 112 dB!?!
-
KlausR.
01:20:29 06/15/07
(
5
)
Geez, you still on this??
-
john.potis@comcast.net
11:32:19 06/15/07
(
3
)
I made a serious mistake and nobody spotted it !!!!!
-
KlausR.
23:47:50 06/18/07
(2)
LOL!! Start holding your breath... now!!
-
john.potis@comcast.net
07:02:46 06/19/07
(1)
RE: LOL!! Start holding your breath... now!!
-
KlausR.
05:23:09 06/20/07
(0)
okay
-
Larry I
09:54:02 06/15/07
(0)
The point? 134dB is better. Right? ;-) nt
-
markrohr
12:53:17 06/14/07
(2)
RE: The point? 134dB is better. Right? ;-) nt
-
Ivan303
16:28:03 06/14/07
(1)
LOL! If only . . .
-
markrohr
08:27:51 06/15/07
(0)
This one's for you, Klaus
-
Srajan Ebaen
02:59:48 06/14/07
(1)
That's food for another thread, not just a sidetrack
-
KlausR.
04:30:38 06/14/07
(0)
Loud and proud is my philosophy...
-
Wellfed
22:12:07 06/08/07
(0)
RE: 6moons "Mortars into bricks"
-
jcoe
18:02:15 06/07/07
(0)
RE: 6moons "Mortars into bricks"
-
ramw
09:50:59 06/06/07
(0)
He seemed dismayed by his experience, in general. I'd give him a pass on the watts thing.
-
Enophile
08:35:01 06/06/07
(
6
)
RE: He seemed dismayed by his experience, in general. I'd give him a pass on the watts thing.
-
john curl
11:17:36 06/09/07
(
5
)
Agree! The inherently superior small amp idea is so old school! NT
-
lancelot
15:32:11 06/14/07
(1)
RE: Agree! The inherently superior small amp idea is so old school! NT
-
john curl
14:57:29 06/19/07
(0)
On closer reading...an fyi
-
michaelavorgna
12:31:52 06/11/07
(0)
I glanced right past the La Scala part!
-
Enophile
20:43:35 06/10/07
(1)
RE: I glanced right past the La Scala part!
-
john.potis@comcast.net
05:24:55 06/13/07
(0)
I feel so deprived.
-
Dave Pogue
07:25:09 06/06/07
(
12
)
Glad your happy
-
Robert Hamel
16:47:33 06/09/07
(0)
And, trust me folks,...
-
rlw
04:43:49 06/08/07
(
10
)
Richard, they won't believe you.
-
Dave Pogue
05:05:53 06/08/07
(
9
)
I believe you, but I am curious.......
-
Bruce Kendall
14:49:34 06/09/07
(
4
)
The SET amps do 95+% of the work
-
Dave Pogue
18:24:26 06/09/07
(
3
)
Nuffin' like a BIG PSU neiver! maaaaate! ;-)
-
Timbo in Oz
16:49:16 06/14/07
(0)
RE: The SET amps do 95+% of the work
-
thetubeguy1954
12:14:17 06/12/07
(1)
RE: The SET amps do 95+% of the work
-
Dave Pogue
12:54:59 06/12/07
(0)
I just goes to show you...
-
rlw
11:58:08 06/08/07
(
3
)
RE: I just goes to show you...
-
Dave Pogue
12:20:33 06/08/07
(2)
You guys sure you ain't misbehavin'?...
-
Wellfed
19:25:41 06/08/07
(1)
S-ay E-verything is T-reble
-
jdouglas51
06:53:28 06/09/07
(0)
You are right!
-
Larry I
04:55:06 06/06/07
(
58
)
RE: You are right! Well.......
-
Awe-d-o-file
16:01:09 06/08/07
(2)
RE: You are right! Well.......
-
Larry I
16:57:41 06/08/07
(1)
RE: You are right! Well.......
-
Awe-d-o-file
10:15:47 06/09/07
(0)
Well said
-
E-Stat
10:17:45 06/07/07
(0)
"Nimble" -- excellent word choice! nt
-
clarkjohnsen
10:02:44 06/07/07
(0)
But Klaus is right about the power required to reproduce real music sound pressure levels
-
DeccaDevotee
08:07:01 06/06/07
(2)
that was a NAD promotional piece that way overstated the requirements IIRC
-
Timbo in Oz
19:13:12 06/14/07
(1)
Not sure where NAD comes in was actually MF kWs
-
DeccaDevotee
07:28:43 06/15/07
(0)
From Art Ludwig's sound pages
-
KlausR.
05:37:36 06/06/07
(
49
)
Nice Listening Room
-
Larry I
08:06:12 06/06/07
(
48
)
RE: Nice Listening Room
-
KlausR.
23:59:04 06/06/07
(
47
)
RE: Nice Listening Room
-
Srajan Ebaen
00:41:51 06/07/07
(
46
)
There are compromises in everything including making good sounding, very highly efficient speakers. NT
-
lancelot
17:52:17 06/07/07
(0)
Dynamic range
-
KlausR.
02:47:53 06/07/07
(
44
)
Dynamic range...
-
mkuller
09:56:49 06/08/07
(2)
Bob Katz' "Honor roll"
-
KlausR.
22:03:30 06/08/07
(1)
Honor roll...
-
mkuller
13:17:10 06/09/07
(0)
Okay, Let's use your numbers.....
-
Bob Rex
05:48:42 06/07/07
(
37
)
RE: Okay, Let's use your numbers.....
-
KlausR.
07:57:22 06/07/07
(
25
)
What do you mean you guess????
-
Bob Rex
11:21:39 06/07/07
(1)
RE: What do you mean you guess????
-
KlausR.
05:19:13 06/08/07
(0)
RE: Okay, Let's use your numbers.....
-
Srajan Ebaen
10:21:58 06/07/07
(
21
)
Exposure to occupational noise...
-
KlausR.
10:35:56 06/07/07
(
20
)
RE: Exposure to occupational noise...
-
Srajan Ebaen
21:51:30 06/07/07
(
19
)
RE: Exposure to occupational noise...
-
Awe-d-o-file
16:22:28 06/08/07
(
17
)
RE: Exposure to occupational noise...
-
john.potis@comcast.net
09:22:52 06/09/07
(
16
)
Faithfulness to the original event
-
KlausR.
02:08:00 06/10/07
(
10
)
RE: Faithfulness to the original event
-
RC Daniel
16:37:03 06/11/07
(1)
RE: In what context was this stated?
-
KlausR.
08:10:08 06/12/07
(0)
RE: Faithfulness to the original event
-
Larry I
11:07:32 06/11/07
(0)
RE: Faithfulness to the original event
-
john.potis@comcast.net
05:50:28 06/10/07
(
6
)
Re: Somebody else’s words
-
KlausR.
08:28:58 06/10/07
(
5
)
RE: Re: Somebody else’s words
-
john.potis@comcast.net
09:12:53 06/10/07
(
4
)
"You don’t have the experience to develop your own opinions." Ooh! That's strong.
-
clarkjohnsen
12:47:38 06/10/07
(
3
)
RE: "You don’t have the experience to develop your own opinions." Ooh! That's strong.
-
john.potis@comcast.net
13:43:38 06/10/07
(2)
RE: "You don’t have the experience to develop your own opinions." Ooh! That's strong.
-
Shiden Kai
17:09:45 06/15/07
(0)
Eggs Ackley! nt
-
clarkjohnsen
13:45:03 06/10/07
(0)
RE: Exposure to occupational noise...
-
Awe-d-o-file
10:28:10 06/09/07
(
4
)
The Role of the Reviewer
-
jamesgarvin
09:40:53 06/13/07
(0)
RE: Exposure to occupational noise...
-
john.potis@comcast.net
13:09:23 06/09/07
(2)
RE: Exposure to occupational noise...
-
Srajan Ebaen
14:43:50 06/09/07
(1)
"Well put, John. No wonder you're on staff." Warning: LOVEFEST!
-
clarkjohnsen
12:50:53 06/10/07
(0)
RE: Exposure to occupational noise...
-
KlausR.
01:40:24 06/08/07
(0)
Huh? What did you say? Can't hear you! (nt)
-
E-Stat
10:21:20 06/07/07
(0)
not really a "loudness" or SPL debate....
-
jim@signalpath
06:39:24 06/07/07
(
10
)
I'd enjoy hearing your 'subjective analyses on relative sound quality'...
-
Wellfed
23:02:56 06/08/07
(1)
I get in enough trouble as it is ;))
-
jim@signalpath
16:35:59 06/14/07
(0)
Ummm....
-
Bob Rex
18:29:29 06/07/07
(1)
RE: Ummm....
-
jim@signalpath
10:02:00 06/08/07
(0)
"Observing board protocols, I'll shelve subjective analyses." Huh?!! nt
-
clarkjohnsen
10:05:05 06/07/07
(2)
RE: "Observing board protocols, I'll shelve subjective analyses." Huh?!! nt
-
jim@signalpath
10:54:10 06/07/07
(1)
Got it! nt
-
clarkjohnsen
11:01:40 06/07/07
(0)
Interesting Demo.
-
Larry I
07:27:45 06/07/07
(2)
Hey, you're talking sound. Isn't this thread about numbers? nt
-
clarkjohnsen
10:06:45 06/07/07
(0)
RE: Interesting Demo.
-
jim@signalpath
08:30:53 06/07/07
(0)
Klaus: "CD has 96 dB... (etc)" refers to
-
Gregm
05:11:22 06/07/07
(2)
RE: Klaus: "CD has 96 dB... (etc)" refers to
-
KlausR.
06:25:55 06/07/07
(1)
More musings
-
Shiden Kai
13:53:47 06/09/07
(0)
POLL!!!
-
bushbison
17:22:05 06/05/07
(0)
A general question sparked by a specific Stereophile review:
-
Enophile
20:23:49 06/03/07
(
13
)
RE: A general question sparked by a specific Stereophile review:
-
Awe-d-o-file
17:14:29 06/08/07
(0)
more trees die, for a flying mole review?
-
jdouglas51
17:19:56 06/04/07
(
3
)
Fallacy
-
kavakidd
10:58:10 06/05/07
(1)
Indeed. But there are those who would put tens of thousands of farmers out of work. nt
-
clarkjohnsen
11:54:30 06/05/07
(0)
We live in the Garden of Eden, yeah..
-
Wellfed
21:35:24 06/04/07
(0)
It has been my experience
-
Bruce Kendall
10:47:14 06/04/07
(
7
)
Hey, amigo! OK, then...
-
Enophile
10:57:14 06/04/07
(
6
)
Thank you! I'm hoping to be out your way next month.
-
Bruce Kendall
12:01:11 06/04/07
(
5
)
I was sitting next to you at CES checking out the sound of the Flying Mole
-
Grover
08:56:06 06/07/07
(
4
)
And given the quality of what we heard,
-
Bruce Kendall
11:18:12 06/07/07
(
3
)
RE: And given the quality of what we heard,
-
unclestu52
12:29:03 06/07/07
(2)
No Zetex recollections here.
-
Bruce Kendall
12:44:45 06/07/07
(1)
RE: No Zetex recollections here.
-
unclestu52
02:22:04 06/08/07
(0)
some thoughts on polarity
-
truthseekerprime
14:03:10 06/03/07
(
137
)
re:Polarity...a PLOT of "said" waveform
-
PeAK
06:28:40 07/11/07
(0)
Afraid I agree with Dave Pogue, DG is easy to pick, for me
-
Timbo in Oz
17:10:48 06/14/07
(
9
)
IOWords a LOT of waht MATTERs to humans in getting music is about asymmetrical wave forms
-
Timbo in Oz
17:19:18 06/14/07
(
8
)
"Piano notes just don't have have a continuous tone - so how can we TELL it is one, eh? "
-
truthseekerprime
18:00:01 06/14/07
(
7
)
Some people can't hear stereo ever I've met 3,a nd they could only hear AP on phones on mono
-
Timbo in Oz
18:05:34 06/14/07
(
6
)
RE: Some people can't hear stereo ever I've met 3,a nd they could only hear AP on phones on mono
-
truthseekerprime
07:03:16 06/15/07
(
5
)
RE: Some people can't hear stereo ever I've met 3,a nd they could only hear AP on phones on mono
-
unclestu52
22:15:36 06/15/07
(1)
RE: Some people can't hear stereo ever I've met 3,a nd they could only hear AP on phones on mono
-
truthseekerprime
11:14:55 06/16/07
(0)
there's NO sustained part in a piano note, did you not get that!
-
Timbo in Oz
12:36:10 06/15/07
(2)
You're the one with the problem in accepting AP - do bear that in mind
-
Timbo in Oz
13:01:03 06/15/07
(1)
"We already have blind test results that show AP is audible. "
-
truthseekerprime
11:13:44 06/16/07
(0)
RE: some thoughts on polarity
-
truthseekerprime
17:38:03 06/09/07
(2)
RE: some thoughts on polarity
-
unclestu52
23:04:11 06/15/07
(0)
If this is the case,
-
Dave Pogue
05:11:45 06/12/07
(0)
Some interesting tests, but this is all irrelevant. Give me the ability to switch and I will decide myself.
-
Norm
06:43:34 06/06/07
(
49
)
Give it up, Norm; he reverts to photo-in-the-freezer, the default position on his audio-mind's Commodore.
-
clarkjohnsen
11:42:31 06/06/07
(
46
)
I would have expected you to be a staunch supporter..
-
rick_m
14:15:34 06/06/07
(
45
)
Thank you! "The next step is surely to promulgate a body of knowledge."
-
clarkjohnsen
09:44:11 06/07/07
(2)
Twenty years may be enough...
-
rick_m
13:13:40 06/07/07
(1)
Thanks for the inspirational message -- in marked contrast to my various antagonists.
-
clarkjohnsen
09:40:07 06/08/07
(0)
RE: I would have expected you to be a staunch supporter..
-
unclestu52
19:42:31 06/06/07
(
41
)
RE: I would have expected you to be a staunch supporter..
-
TomLarson
20:07:15 06/06/07
(
40
)
RE: "don't think he's primarily concerned with selling books"
-
tlyyra
03:47:45 06/09/07
(1)
RE: "don't think he's primarily concerned with selling books"
-
TomLarson
15:13:45 06/09/07
(0)
Thanks! And you are correct, I am poor at "profiting". On the other hand...
-
clarkjohnsen
09:56:10 06/07/07
(
37
)
Before I criticized you
-
unclestu52
02:45:02 06/08/07
(
36
)
Just wondering, have you read the book? nt
-
TomLarson
19:16:19 06/08/07
(
35
)
Yes ( nt )
-
unclestu52
01:15:26 06/10/07
(1)
RE: Yes
-
unclestu52
01:46:00 06/10/07
(0)
Should we read the book?
-
tlyyra
04:38:19 06/09/07
(
32
)
RE: Should we read the book?
-
TomLarson
09:05:52 06/09/07
(
31
)
RE: Should we read the book?
-
truthseekerprime
09:47:46 06/09/07
(
30
)
RE: Should we read the book?
-
TomLarson
11:04:58 06/09/07
(
29
)
Oh they huff and they puff... and they blow themselves silly. You're right: Typical web ranters. nt
-
clarkjohnsen
12:54:40 06/10/07
(0)
"a good number of the most vocal critics of the book have not read it."
-
truthseekerprime
11:22:31 06/09/07
(
27
)
Quoting someone who doesn't like it is pretty lame in my opinion. nt
-
TomLarson
15:08:08 06/09/07
(
26
)
What about quoting the author's statements on this forum...
-
truthseekerprime
15:47:42 06/09/07
(
25
)
RE: What about quoting the author's statements on this forum...
-
TomLarson
17:35:32 06/09/07
(
24
)
The "author" is perfectly happy having any of his statements here quoted.
-
clarkjohnsen
13:06:02 06/10/07
(1)
RE: The "author" is perfectly happy having any of his statements here quoted.
-
TomLarson
14:00:49 06/10/07
(0)
True, but limited.
-
rick_m
22:07:06 06/09/07
(
21
)
"I owe Clark for my knowing about it." Thank you! Then my work here is almost done.
-
clarkjohnsen
13:07:52 06/10/07
(0)
RE: True, but limited.
-
TomLarson
07:08:06 06/10/07
(
19
)
"If you flipped the switch... and never heard anything..." It's all in the book!
-
clarkjohnsen
13:10:09 06/10/07
(0)
"The fact that some speakers show it up more...that is a different set of questions in my mind"
-
truthseekerprime
09:07:22 06/10/07
(
14
)
RE: "The fact that some speakers show it up more...that is a different set of questions in my mind"
-
TomLarson
13:53:49 06/10/07
(
4
)
"What I can and cannot know is not something that you get to determine by fiat." He can try!
-
clarkjohnsen
08:20:09 06/11/07
(0)
RE: "The fact that some speakers show it up more...that is a different set of questions in my mind"
-
truthseekerprime
14:22:46 06/10/07
(2)
RE: "The fact that some speakers show it up more...that is a different set of questions in my mind"
-
TomLarson
15:40:24 06/10/07
(1)
Good story! See, there are those who through their obstreperousness would hide the truth from us. nt
-
clarkjohnsen
08:21:48 06/11/07
(0)
"How do you know...?" "How do you know...?" "How do you know...?" And now, the answer:
-
clarkjohnsen
13:25:59 06/10/07
(0)
RE: "The fact that some speakers show it up more...that is a different set of questions in my mind"
-
unclestu52
11:48:05 06/10/07
(
7
)
RE: "The fact that some speakers show it up more...that is a different set of questions in my mind"
-
TomLarson
13:58:20 06/10/07
(
6
)
Sigh
-
unclestu52
22:45:16 06/12/07
(0)
RE: "The fact that some speakers show it up more...that is a different set of questions in my mind"
-
truthseekerprime
11:48:22 06/11/07
(
3
)
RE: "The fact that some speakers show it up more...that is a different set of questions in my mind"
-
TomLarson
17:47:28 06/11/07
(2)
RE: "The fact that some speakers show it up more...that is a different set of questions in my mind"
-
truthseekerprime
20:55:38 06/11/07
(1)
Finding some that don't cut it doesn't mean that none do.
-
TomLarson
22:00:25 06/11/07
(0)
"If the hi end speakers we listen to are in the class of instamatic cameras..." Oh MAN!
-
clarkjohnsen
08:18:31 06/11/07
(0)
RE: True, but limited.
-
rick_m
09:01:41 06/10/07
(2)
Imagine that! We have an inquisitive soul! Certainly a pleasant change. I mean...
-
clarkjohnsen
13:17:02 06/10/07
(1)
How do you know you're in correct phase? (NT)
-
unclestu52
12:41:24 07/11/07
(0)
RE: Some interesting tests, but this is all irrelevant. Give me the ability to switch and I will decide myself
-
truthseekerprime
07:40:51 06/06/07
(1)
I know it is not psychological although that too is quantifiable. The interesting question is why producers
-
Norm
19:02:10 06/08/07
(0)
Some very good thoughts on polarity!
-
unclestu52
21:41:58 06/04/07
(
3
)
RE: Some very good thoughts on polarity!
-
truthseekerprime
12:14:02 06/05/07
(2)
RE: Some very good thoughts on polarity!
-
unclestu52
12:49:57 06/05/07
(1)
RE: Some very good thoughts on polarity!
-
truthseekerprime
14:06:13 06/05/07
(0)
RE: some thoughts on polarity
-
truthseekerprime
10:41:27 06/04/07
(
20
)
"Reflections off hard surfaces invert the phase of sound waves." Really?!
-
clarkjohnsen
09:34:46 06/05/07
(
6
)
Ask him about reflections off openings in the room...
-
truthseekerprime
12:16:39 06/05/07
(
5
)
That wasn't the topic and you know it. You were WRONG; admit it, don't weasel out.
-
clarkjohnsen
12:23:26 06/05/07
(
4
)
I'll admit I was wrong, if that makes you feel any better. -nt
-
Axon
21:24:37 06/05/07
(0)
Umm....
-
truthseekerprime
12:31:49 06/05/07
(2)
"Did you bother to read anything I wrote?" Regrettably, yes.
-
clarkjohnsen
12:54:30 06/05/07
(1)
At the very least,,
-
unclestu52
18:45:30 06/05/07
(0)
RE: some thoughts on polarity
-
rick_m
19:50:34 06/04/07
(
12
)
reflected waves
-
truthseekerprime
21:21:45 06/04/07
(
11
)
RE: reflected waves
-
rick_m
23:28:29 06/04/07
(
10
)
"I'm hanging on to my belief that sound waves do NOT invert when bouncing off of solid objects."
-
truthseekerprime
07:59:23 06/05/07
(
6
)
Wow! I'll own up to being wrong too.
-
Axon
21:23:17 06/05/07
(1)
Ah shucks...
-
rick_m
22:35:34 06/05/07
(0)
I agree...
-
rick_m
09:04:47 06/05/07
(
3
)
RE: I agree...
-
truthseekerprime
12:44:52 06/05/07
(2)
RE: I agree...
-
rick_m
16:32:53 06/05/07
(1)
RE: I agree...
-
unclestu52
23:46:54 06/05/07
(0)
RE: reflected waves
-
truthseekerprime
05:18:38 06/05/07
(2)
RE: reflected waves
-
rick_m
08:31:33 06/05/07
(1)
You're correct - see my post above
-
truthseekerprime
08:59:50 06/05/07
(0)
"50 years of anecdotal evidence hasn't gotten anyone to take this seriously." Seriously? You're a laff riot.
-
clarkjohnsen
09:55:58 06/04/07
(
14
)
A very simple question
-
unclestu52
12:17:05 06/08/07
(0)
RE: "50 years of anecdotal evidence hasn't gotten anyone to take this seriously." Seriously? You're a laff ri
-
truthseekerprime
10:23:05 06/04/07
(
9
)
RE: "50 years of anecdotal evidence hasn't gotten anyone to take this seriously." Seriously? You're a laff ri
-
john curl
13:30:01 06/04/07
(1)
RE: "50 years of anecdotal evidence hasn't gotten anyone to take this seriously." Seriously? You're a laff ri
-
truthseekerprime
13:59:00 06/04/07
(0)
More lies. To them it was *all* about music, every name named.
-
clarkjohnsen
10:30:40 06/04/07
(
6
)
caught yet again
-
truthseekerprime
12:09:57 06/05/07
(2)
By now you've figured out ...
-
Dave Pogue
12:47:57 06/05/07
(0)
More lies, followed by more and more lies. Is it congenital, or constitutional, with you? nt
-
clarkjohnsen
12:14:59 06/05/07
(0)
Why is it,
-
unclestu52
21:16:36 06/04/07
(0)
RE: More lies. To them it was *all* about music, every name named.
-
truthseekerprime
10:34:21 06/04/07
(1)
"You... misrepresent[ed] research on this subject." A TOTAL LIE.
-
clarkjohnsen
10:46:35 06/04/07
(0)
God, Clark, get a grip. He's not jj. -nt
-
Axon
10:20:15 06/04/07
(2)
Elsewhere it was stated, without contradiction, that he is. Anyway...
-
clarkjohnsen
10:24:29 06/04/07
(1)
RE: Elsewhere it was stated, without contradiction, that he is. Anyway...
-
truthseekerprime
10:35:39 06/04/07
(0)
My favorite audiophile hobby quote: "We argue so violently because the stakes are so low."
-
Enophile
19:44:50 06/03/07
(
10
)
Uh--that's a steal from Henry Kissinger, believe it or not....
-
Bill Leebens
18:24:53 06/07/07
(0)
Good Post -I agree NT
-
lancelot
07:46:34 06/04/07
(
8
)
Switches are not to be trusted. nt
-
clarkjohnsen
09:29:51 06/04/07
(
7
)
All switches or just some? And how do you know which ones? nt
-
KlausR.
09:41:34 06/04/07
(
6
)
how do you know which ones?
-
unclestu52
21:47:05 06/04/07
(
4
)
RE: how do you know which ones?
-
KlausR.
05:01:39 06/05/07
(
3
)
RE: how do you know which ones?
-
unclestu52
16:51:59 06/05/07
(2)
RE: how do you know which ones?
-
KlausR.
00:42:12 06/06/07
(1)
RE: how do you know which ones?
-
unclestu52
03:05:43 06/06/07
(0)
I listen. nt
-
clarkjohnsen
09:57:01 06/04/07
(0)
RE: some thoughts on polarity
-
truthseekerprime
15:23:19 06/03/07
(1)
RE: some thoughts on polarity
-
TomLarson
17:02:52 06/03/07
(0)
Audibility will depend almost entirely on the speakers used.
-
Dave Pogue
14:53:18 06/03/07
(
19
)
can you clarify?
-
truthseekerprime
15:26:21 06/03/07
(
18
)
RE: can you clarify?
-
Dave Pogue
16:22:34 06/03/07
(
17
)
There is a lot of misinformation about difference between polarity and phase.
-
Presto
11:47:13 06/04/07
(
4
)
A very short list
-
unclestu52
21:24:54 06/04/07
(0)
RE: There is a lot of misinformation about difference between polarity and phase.
-
truthseekerprime
12:26:57 06/04/07
(0)
RE: There is a lot of misinformation about difference between polarity and phase.
-
Dave Pogue
12:06:46 06/04/07
(1)
Thanks to all for the "real world" examples.
-
Presto
11:19:42 06/05/07
(0)
RE: can you clarify?
-
truthseekerprime
20:52:17 06/03/07
(
11
)
Polarity and ESLs
-
Dave Pogue
04:23:15 06/04/07
(
10
)
RE: Polarity and ESLs
-
truthseekerprime
06:51:14 06/04/07
(
9
)
recordings
-
unclestu52
21:55:12 06/04/07
(0)
Okay, here's the test CD.
-
Dave Pogue
09:53:45 06/04/07
(
4
)
RE: Okay, here's the test CD.
-
truthseekerprime
20:19:17 06/04/07
(2)
With respect to speaker-listening,
-
Dave Pogue
03:12:18 06/05/07
(0)
Any track will do.
-
Dave Pogue
02:56:39 06/05/07
(0)
OK, I'll try to get hold of that.
-
truthseekerprime
10:24:05 06/04/07
(0)
This just in.
-
Dave Pogue
08:13:38 06/04/07
(0)
RE: Polarity and ESLs
-
Dave Pogue
07:29:17 06/04/07
(1)
RE: Polarity and ESLs
-
truthseekerprime
10:26:24 06/04/07
(0)
Rock Legend Ozzy calls Sanjaya of A Idol.......
-
Bill the K
05:52:11 06/01/07
(0)
Inaccurate vinyl reviews in TAS and Tracking Angle.
-
ruxtonvet
20:58:25 05/30/07
(
15
)
Fremer hints that the original 'Blue' is very good...
-
Bung
13:54:13 06/04/07
(1)
"He chose not to correct the soundstage issues." How *would* one do that? nt
-
clarkjohnsen
09:04:07 06/05/07
(0)
Try not to confuse opinion with a definitive fact.
-
Analog Scott
04:45:48 06/02/07
(
6
)
RE: You should try too!
-
Mel
06:06:00 06/05/07
(0)
However, reviewers, even record reviewers, can at times simply get it wrong. nt
-
TomLarson
08:23:58 06/02/07
(
4
)
I'm not saying you are wrong, reviewers are human too but what...
-
Analog Scott
11:18:47 06/02/07
(
3
)
RE: I'm not saying you are wrong, reviewers are human too but what...
-
TomLarson
17:47:19 06/02/07
(2)
I would agree that "this is my opinion"...
-
David W. Robinson
12:39:45 06/03/07
(1)
"Kindredness is at the heart of this relationship." You'd think more people would have realized this by now. n
-
clarkjohnsen
09:59:34 06/04/07
(0)
It's entirely possible you were listening with incorrect polarity. nt
-
clarkjohnsen
08:07:27 05/31/07
(
3
)
See my post above, the soundstage is different from the original. n/t
-
Bung
13:56:58 06/04/07
(0)
Unless noted otherwise, it's possible the reviewers were as well. (nt)
-
soulfood
17:00:33 05/31/07
(0)
RE: It's entirely possible you were listening with incorrect polarity. nt
-
Wendell Narrod
09:40:41 05/31/07
(0)
When they say "it's about the music" this is not what they mean....nt
-
TomLarson
21:30:18 05/30/07
(1)
RE: When they say "it's about the music" this is not what they mean....nt
-
tullman
09:31:09 06/10/07
(0)
Rod M, speaking as an AARP member...
-
Wellfed
20:46:00 05/20/07
(0)
I ABX'd absolute polarity!
-
Axon
09:35:36 05/18/07
(
99
)
Careful!
-
bjh
18:28:52 05/24/07
(0)
Re: I ABX'd absolute polarity!
-
rjd
12:40:01 05/20/07
(
8
)
Definitely! nt
-
clarkjohnsen
10:33:11 05/21/07
(
7
)
RE: Definitely you can hear it
-
PhillyB
05:40:29 05/23/07
(
6
)
PhillyB: Remote polarity on your SA-7S1?
-
Bob Stern
17:41:30 05/24/07
(
3
)
Answered my own question
-
Bob Stern
18:30:43 05/24/07
(2)
RE: Answered my own question
-
PhillyB
17:10:47 05/26/07
(1)
Requires a computer-programmable remote
-
Bob Stern
18:26:05 05/26/07
(0)
Almost *anyone* can hear it -- if they're of a mind to try. Alas, there's the hitch. nt
-
clarkjohnsen
10:06:31 05/23/07
(0)
Well stated. nt
-
geoffkait
06:30:25 05/23/07
(0)
I heard a rumor that
-
Bruce Kendall
12:33:45 05/20/07
(0)
Good for you
-
unclestu52
18:43:13 05/18/07
(
24
)
The difference between P and B is that the vocal cords vibrate with the B. nt
-
TomLarson
18:53:09 05/20/07
(0)
My take is slightly different
-
Dave Pogue
05:57:08 05/20/07
(
22
)
Halcro DM10 has a remote polarity switch
-
Halcroman
21:34:17 05/21/07
(0)
db Systems has one
-
Atexanathome
16:16:09 05/21/07
(
6
)
Do you happen to know ....
-
Dave Pogue
14:30:41 05/25/07
(
5
)
It's a DB-7
-
Atexanathome
15:53:32 05/25/07
(
4
)
RE: It's a DB-7
-
john curl
10:01:51 05/26/07
(2)
"We have been including absolute phase in our best designs for many decades." Sez it all! nt
-
clarkjohnsen
09:06:31 05/29/07
(0)
RE: It's a DB-7
-
john curl
14:40:01 05/26/07
(0)
Thank you. I found the reference ...
-
Dave Pogue
16:39:46 05/25/07
(0)
RE: My take is slightly different
-
unclestu52
12:24:55 05/20/07
(0)
RE: My take is slightly different
-
john curl
10:32:02 05/20/07
(
12
)
I guess if it were easy to do,
-
Dave Pogue
11:14:55 05/20/07
(
11
)
RE: I guess if it were easy to do,
-
john curl
13:27:39 05/20/07
(
10
)
Re: "I happen to have a Porsche...and I have an Acura..."
-
tlyyra
04:35:51 05/22/07
(
7
)
RE: Re: "I happen to have a Porsche...and I have an Acura..."
-
john curl
09:39:01 05/22/07
(
6
)
RE: Re: "I happen to have a Porsche...and I have an Acura..."
-
tlyyra
10:19:54 05/22/07
(
5
)
RE: Re: "I happen to have a Porsche...and I have an Acura..."
-
john curl
13:30:12 05/22/07
(
4
)
RE: Re: "I happen to have a Porsche...and I have an Acura..."
-
tlyyra
14:13:20 05/22/07
(
3
)
RE: Re: "I happen to have a Porsche...and I have an Acura..."
-
john curl
15:11:55 05/22/07
(2)
RE: Re: "I happen to have a Porsche...and I have an Acura..."
-
tlyyra
04:08:00 05/23/07
(1)
And how do you define character attacks that YOU make??
-
robert young
05:26:54 05/23/07
(0)
RE: I guess if it were easy to do,
-
Mike B.
13:06:07 05/21/07
(1)
RE: I guess if it were easy to do,
-
john curl
14:47:46 05/21/07
(0)
"Inversion was performed with foo_invert, a plugin of my own devising." Uh-oh.
-
clarkjohnsen
11:05:26 05/18/07
(
62
)
I never said that this was literature-worthy
-
Axon
12:03:51 05/18/07
(
61
)
Clark's double-blind, sorry, triple-blind tests
-
KlausR.
00:02:33 05/19/07
(
60
)
Re: Clark's double-blind, sorry, triple-blind tests
-
Pat D
19:54:37 05/20/07
(
9
)
I really wish
-
unclestu52
12:41:15 05/22/07
(
6
)
RE: I really wish
-
Ted Smith
13:10:32 05/22/07
(
5
)
RE: I really wish
-
unclestu52
20:07:15 05/22/07
(2)
I agree 100%. (nt)
-
Dave Pogue
04:58:19 05/23/07
(0)
PS
-
unclestu52
02:15:19 05/23/07
(0)
"Nuanced"? Who, me? [Blush]
-
clarkjohnsen
13:52:24 05/22/07
(1)
"nip. nip. nip!"
-
unclestu52
18:16:03 05/22/07
(0)
RE: distortion inherent in the LP medium and playback could make the polarity reversal more audible
-
KlausR.
01:55:25 05/21/07
(1)
Also, tubed or single-ended amplifiers may have significant even harmonics...
-
Axon
06:58:02 05/21/07
(0)
Re: Clark's double-blind, sorry, triple-blind tests
-
john curl
13:36:43 05/20/07
(
42
)
RE: Re: Clark's double-blind, sorry, triple-blind tests
-
john curl
10:07:16 05/21/07
(
8
)
RE: Ignore it, and remain in ignorance!
-
KlausR.
06:40:10 05/23/07
(
6
)
RE: Ignore it, and remain in ignorance!
-
unclestu52
13:32:34 05/23/07
(
3
)
RE: Ignore it, and remain in ignorance!
-
KlausR.
00:02:38 05/24/07
(2)
Pardon me,
-
unclestu52
02:49:53 05/24/07
(1)
RE: Pardon me,
-
KlausR.
05:51:35 05/24/07
(0)
RE: Ignore it, and remain in ignorance!
-
john curl
08:25:25 05/23/07
(1)
RE: Ignore it, and remain in ignorance!
-
KlausR.
00:06:02 05/24/07
(0)
"This was the LAW until fairly recent times." Gotta love those scientists and their "laws".
-
clarkjohnsen
10:20:39 05/21/07
(0)
I consider mythbusting as useful, thank your for asking!
-
KlausR.
06:56:31 05/21/07
(
31
)
"which results Clark refuses to provide for unknown reasons." Huh! Here I thought...
-
clarkjohnsen
10:01:35 05/21/07
(
30
)
Where did I make ASSERTIONS ???
-
KlausR.
01:55:21 05/22/07
(
29
)
"Nobody will blame you." Now that's an assertion, and likely erroneous.
-
clarkjohnsen
10:56:57 05/22/07
(
28
)
RE: The overall score was 84/137. Where do you get this?
-
KlausR.
22:12:25 05/22/07
(
27
)
"you don't know what confidence levels in statistisc means." Take it up with Stanley, why don't you?
-
clarkjohnsen
10:04:00 05/23/07
(
26
)
RE: confidence levels
-
KlausR.
00:21:09 05/24/07
(
25
)
"Lipshitz made a mistake in his paper, that's all." No, that's not all.
-
clarkjohnsen
11:31:04 05/24/07
(
24
)
RE: Heyser expressed an opinion...
-
KlausR.
21:56:48 05/24/07
(
23
)
"He is not providing any evidence." No? How about the evidence of his ears?
-
clarkjohnsen
08:07:49 05/25/07
(
22
)
I respect someone's convictions!
-
KlausR.
09:05:33 05/25/07
(
21
)
The thread is about Lipshitz, and that's whom I was speaking of. Obviously.
-
clarkjohnsen
09:39:37 05/25/07
(
20
)
answer the question, please
-
truthseekerprime
13:39:29 05/25/07
(
6
)
RE: for music
-
jensw
11:27:19 05/26/07
(1)
Too logical! nt
-
clarkjohnsen
09:11:45 05/29/07
(0)
"Do Lipshitz' results demonstrate that polarity reversal is audible in music? Yes or no?"
-
clarkjohnsen
11:15:27 05/26/07
(1)
just answer the question
-
truthseekerprime
14:51:40 05/26/07
(0)
Sorry the sidetrack: Noticed same - can't find your recent posts.
-
tlyyra
15:21:55 05/25/07
(1)
answer the question, please
-
truthseekerprime
21:26:54 05/25/07
(0)
Thus spoke Lipshitz
-
tlyyra
12:50:07 05/25/07
(
12
)
While I am well advised (by the moderator) not to respond to you...
-
clarkjohnsen
11:29:54 05/26/07
(
11
)
RE: While I am well advised (by the moderator) not to respond to you...
-
tlyyra
14:05:09 05/27/07
(0)
Yes or no?
-
truthseekerprime
14:49:32 05/26/07
(
9
)
Why don't you take your problems up with *him*?
-
clarkjohnsen
13:34:58 05/27/07
(
8
)
Sorry, but you've really lost all credibility now
-
truthseekerprime
21:01:10 05/28/07
(
7
)
Told you: No more discussion until you rectify your blatant lies. nt
-
clarkjohnsen
09:05:26 05/29/07
(
6
)
This is the Critic's Corner, not the Whiner's Woad, Clark. n/t
-
tlyyra
06:56:25 05/30/07
(
4
)
RE: This is the Critic's Corner, not the Whiner's Woad, Clark. n/t
-
truthseekerprime
06:57:05 06/03/07
(1)
Re: "An object lesson"
-
tlyyra
02:01:07 06/09/07
(0)
Truth speaks severely to liars -- no wonder you hate it. nt
-
clarkjohnsen
09:23:09 05/30/07
(1)
So bring us the truth...
-
tlyyra
01:05:45 05/31/07
(0)
And how would you like me to do that?
-
truthseekerprime
12:43:47 05/29/07
(0)
RE: Re: Clark's double-blind, sorry, triple-blind tests
-
tlyyra
15:25:55 05/20/07
(0)
I know "literature" when I see some
-
tlyyra
04:36:44 05/20/07
(
4
)
Also note that the alcohol was only a definitive factor for the RME tests
-
Axon
11:30:20 05/20/07
(
3
)
Intriguing research directions
-
tlyyra
16:13:48 05/20/07
(2)
Caffeine has been shown to aggravate tinnitus...
-
SF tech
20:02:43 05/21/07
(1)
I hear you, brother. Now, let's move on.
-
tlyyra
04:20:15 05/22/07
(0)
Re: 100 confidence level = infinity amount of +, and o -. NT.
-
jensw
00:04:22 05/20/07
(1)
Bingo! nt
-
clarkjohnsen
09:57:37 05/21/07
(0)
Stereophile's new owner?
-
Jay
06:02:34 05/17/07
(
9
)
I live 2 miles from Bonita Springs
-
jdarby
15:30:51 06/01/07
(0)
Re: Stereophile's new owner?
-
Merlot_cat
20:09:32 05/19/07
(2)
RE: Re: Stereophile's new owner?
-
John Atkinson
16:14:20 05/20/07
(1)
J.A.- Thanks for your comments and Best of Luck (NT)
-
Merlot_cat
20:58:03 05/20/07
(0)
Man that is *diversified*! nt
-
clarkjohnsen
09:30:13 05/17/07
(0)
Re: Stereophile's new owner?
-
John Atkinson
09:26:29 05/17/07
(
3
)
Tough-looking stock chart...
-
Tom
15:30:48 05/18/07
(2)
Not unusual
-
Sherlock
15:54:46 05/20/07
(0)
Re: Tough-looking stock chart...
-
jdouglas51
18:34:27 05/18/07
(0)
At the Show: "Unhappily they were playing the Dvorak Cello Concerto (with Rostropovich) out of absolute polarity...
-
clarkjohnsen
13:20:31 05/14/07
(
151
)
No doubt people were running out of the room screaming...(nt)
-
mkuller
11:22:12 05/15/07
(
110
)
Now I'm wondering how he could tell it was the Dvorak Cello Concerto (with Rostropovich.) Maybe he had a room libretto?
-
Enophile
11:34:26 05/17/07
(0)
Re: No doubt people were running out of the room screaming...(nt)
-
truthseekerprime
08:37:05 05/16/07
(
106
)
Just some background info about polarity
-
KlausR.
05:38:23 05/17/07
(
69
)
Sorry, doesn't prove a thing
-
Dave Pogue
09:02:12 05/17/07
(
6
)
Re: Sorry, doesn't prove a thing
-
truthseekerprime
09:10:29 05/17/07
(
5
)
Re: Sorry, doesn't prove a thing
-
Dave Pogue
09:38:30 05/17/07
(
4
)
Hot Damn!
-
unclestu52
12:14:54 05/17/07
(
3
)
Re: Hot Damn!
-
Dave Pogue
12:37:31 05/17/07
(2)
Re: Hot Damn!
-
unclestu52
19:51:58 05/17/07
(1)
Re: Hot Damn!
-
Dave Pogue
04:47:51 05/18/07
(0)
Re: Just some background info about polarity
-
truthseekerprime
07:46:06 05/17/07
(
61
)
Large-scale tests were double blind
-
KlausR.
08:31:41 05/17/07
(
60
)
Re: Large-scale tests were double blind
-
truthseekerprime
08:50:14 05/17/07
(
59
)
"How can the vibrations of a guitar string have an absolute polarity?" They don't.
-
clarkjohnsen
09:32:26 05/17/07
(
57
)
Whatever term you want to use.
-
truthseekerprime
09:42:50 05/17/07
(
56
)
Are you simply missing, or deliberately avoiding the real point? nt
-
clarkjohnsen
09:48:45 05/17/07
(
55
)
I don't know - what's the "real point" according to you?
-
truthseekerprime
09:58:20 05/17/07
(
54
)
"According to [me]" has nothing to do with it.
-
clarkjohnsen
10:06:41 05/17/07
(
53
)
the perception of polarity resides in the attack transient.
-
truthseekerprime
10:19:10 05/17/07
(
52
)
"Whether it's compression or rarefaction depends on where the mic was placed," No, where the *ear* is placed.
-
clarkjohnsen
10:23:15 05/17/07
(
51
)
"The mic is in loco auris, remember?" - yes, obviously
-
truthseekerprime
10:30:24 05/17/07
(
50
)
Even though the positioning
-
unclestu52
12:07:14 05/17/07
(
45
)
Re: Even though the positioning
-
truthseekerprime
13:04:00 05/17/07
(
44
)
one more time
-
unclestu52
19:14:26 05/17/07
(
43
)
Re: one more time
-
truthseekerprime
19:28:34 05/17/07
(
42
)
Riddle me this
-
unclestu52
19:53:50 05/17/07
(
14
)
What happens to the leading compression wave?
-
truthseekerprime
22:04:31 05/17/07
(
13
)
Done that (speakers in reversed polarity)
-
unclestu52
23:33:11 05/17/07
(
12
)
Re: Done that (speakers in reversed polarity)
-
truthseekerprime
06:25:30 05/18/07
(
11
)
Re: Done that (speakers in reversed polarity)
-
unclestu52
18:05:29 05/18/07
(
10
)
Re: Done that (speakers in reversed polarity)
-
truthseekerprime
20:46:04 05/18/07
(
9
)
My apologies
-
unclestu52
00:54:47 05/25/07
(
8
)
RE: My apologies
-
truthseekerprime
06:29:52 05/25/07
(
7
)
RE: My apologies
-
unclestu52
13:58:34 05/25/07
(
6
)
RE: My apologies
-
truthseekerprime
17:44:39 05/28/07
(
4
)
several questions
-
unclestu52
21:24:35 05/29/07
(
3
)
RE: several questions
-
truthseekerprime
22:11:43 05/29/07
(2)
RE: several questions
-
unclestu52
13:30:24 06/01/07
(1)
RE: several questions
-
truthseekerprime
14:24:11 06/02/07
(0)
RE: My apologies
-
truthseekerprime
21:36:58 05/25/07
(0)
Your model is too simplistic
-
Ted Smith
19:53:26 05/17/07
(
26
)
That is correct, sir. Another aspect he neglects:
-
clarkjohnsen
08:45:51 05/18/07
(
22
)
Strings on a guitar are not plucked back-or-forth, rather up-and-down.
-
truthseekerprime
16:11:49 05/18/07
(0)
Yep, I can't believe the number of people that like to make pronouncements from on high...
-
Ted Smith
09:24:53 05/18/07
(
20
)
Re: Yep, I can't believe the number of people that like to make pronouncements from on high...
-
tlyyra
11:59:43 05/18/07
(
18
)
Re: Yep, I can't believe the number of people that like to make pronouncements from on high...
-
truthseekerprime
16:44:31 05/18/07
(
15
)
The entire history of the topic (through 1987) is laid out in The Wood Effect, which...
-
clarkjohnsen
10:32:29 05/21/07
(
9
)
When did I ever claim to have read your book? You're fantasizing. I didn't even know it existed until a few days ago.
-
truthseekerprime
14:21:16 05/21/07
(
8
)
"When did I ever claim to have read your book? You're fantasizing." "Truthseeker" gets caught pants-down again!
-
clarkjohnsen
10:01:36 05/22/07
(
7
)
Megalomania at work... typical.
-
truthseekerprime
10:34:06 05/22/07
(
6
)
"Is that clear, or are you still confused?" You were caught, and you know it perfectly well.
-
clarkjohnsen
10:45:46 05/22/07
(
5
)
OK, whatever you say...
-
truthseekerprime
10:52:41 05/22/07
(
4
)
He confesses! nt
-
clarkjohnsen
09:32:28 05/23/07
(
3
)
How old are you Clark?
-
Halcroman
21:46:42 06/04/07
(2)
"You really act like a 5 year old!" With this, you distinguish yourself on your 35th AA post?
-
clarkjohnsen
10:43:17 06/05/07
(1)
With this, you distinguish yourself on your 21665th AA post?
-
tlyyra
02:05:53 06/09/07
(0)
Re: Yep, I can't believe the number of people that like to make pronouncements from on high...
-
Ted Smith
17:54:37 05/18/07
(
4
)
Re: Yep, I can't believe the number of people that like to make pronouncements from on high...
-
truthseekerprime
20:40:50 05/18/07
(
3
)
Re: Yep, I can't believe the number of people that like to make pronouncements from on high...
-
Ted Smith
20:56:02 05/18/07
(2)
interesting
-
unclestu52
12:37:41 05/20/07
(1)
RE: interesting
-
Ted Smith
12:47:45 05/20/07
(0)
Re: Yep, I can't believe the number of people that like to make pronouncements from on high...
-
Ted Smith
15:27:58 05/18/07
(1)
Re: Yep, I can't believe the number of people that like to make pronouncements from on high...
-
truthseekerprime
16:15:32 05/18/07
(0)
"Truthspeakerprime" -- thas' funny, mon! Describes his dude 'tude perfectly. nt
-
clarkjohnsen
09:28:41 05/18/07
(0)
Re: Your model is too simplistic
-
truthseekerprime
21:54:16 05/17/07
(2)
"This was an ideal model." So, "ideal" = "incorrect". Interesting. nt
-
clarkjohnsen
08:41:54 05/18/07
(0)
Re: Your model is too simplistic
-
Ted Smith
07:25:17 05/18/07
(0)
"Obviously neither is better or more realistic." So wrong, so very wrong.
-
clarkjohnsen
10:47:38 05/17/07
(
3
)
OK - game over
-
truthseekerprime
12:32:13 05/17/07
(2)
"It's now clear..." Yeah, clear as mud, in your mind.
-
clarkjohnsen
08:32:54 05/18/07
(0)
Keep up the thought experiments . . .
-
markrohr
05:25:55 05/18/07
(0)
The paper gives an indication for a possible reason. (nt)
-
KlausR.
09:00:29 05/17/07
(