Amp/Preamp Asylum Looking for a new Amp or Preamp? If you're after tubes, post over here. |
|
In Reply to: RE: I disagree with your assessment posted by A.Wayne on December 3, 2014 at 17:52:18:
Yes, I'm nuts. Does that make the truth easier to take?Didn't think so.
The short of it.
Speakers are NOT resistive, as a general rule. They range from slightly capactive or inductive to fairly large extremes of 'reactance'. Large phase angles at the same place as large impedance dips are deadly to any but the more robust amp designs.
Power amps with the SAME RMS power, as measured into a resistor, vary WIDELY in their ability to drive reactive loads. The greater the difference between voltage and current peaks, the WORSE it is.
When voltage and current are 90 degrees apart, NO power is delivered to the load. I've never even heard of this in a loudspeaker. I don't think this is possible in a sound transducer.
What we're talking about here is called 'Power Factor'. Here is the WIKI link which will explain it in general terms. Europe, for example has strict rules on power factor, especially for all those millions of wall warts powering or charging cellphones to lap tops. If you owned a factory, you could be charged a PREMIUM on your electric bill for large power factor usage. You USE VA but get billed for WATTS. Same on your stereo. Speakers use VA, but the amp produces Watts, which are basically from a resistive measure.
PF=1 is pure resistive.
Too much is never enough
Edits: 12/03/14
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: I disagree with your assessment - pictureguy 18:24:02 12/03/14 (38)
- But - Awe-d-o-file 10:35:08 12/05/14 (36)
- RE: But - pictureguy 11:29:58 12/05/14 (35)
- RE: But - morricab 13:40:56 12/05/14 (34)
- RE: But - A.Wayne 15:44:29 12/05/14 (30)
- RE: But - morricab 11:16:34 12/07/14 (28)
- RE: But - A.Wayne 12:44:32 12/07/14 (27)
- RE: But - morricab 02:08:41 12/08/14 (0)
- RE: But - A.Wayne 13:14:58 12/07/14 (25)
- RE: But - morricab 02:16:25 12/08/14 (24)
- RE: But - A.Wayne 08:17:01 12/08/14 (17)
- RE: But - morricab 01:38:29 12/09/14 (16)
- RE: But - A.Wayne 08:59:50 12/09/14 (0)
- RE: But - A.Wayne 08:53:38 12/09/14 (14)
- RE: But - morricab 07:32:42 12/15/14 (13)
- RE: But - A.Wayne 09:20:02 12/15/14 (11)
- RE: But - morricab 15:06:23 12/16/14 (10)
- RE: But - A.Wayne 07:44:32 12/17/14 (8)
- Reading comprehension problems, A.Wayne? - morricab 13:36:06 12/17/14 (7)
- RE: Delusional Morri ...? - A.Wayne 16:32:26 12/17/14 (6)
- RE: Delusional Morri ...? - morricab 13:32:38 12/18/14 (5)
- RE: Delusional Morri ...? - A.Wayne 15:32:54 12/18/14 (4)
- RE: Delusional Morri ...? - morricab 12:50:05 12/20/14 (3)
- RE: Delusional Morri ...? - A.Wayne 13:27:01 12/20/14 (2)
- RE: Delusional Morri ...? - morricab 09:50:38 12/21/14 (1)
- RE: Delusional Morri ...? - A.Wayne 16:55:06 12/21/14 (0)
- RE: But - A.Wayne 07:15:27 12/17/14 (0)
- RE: But - A.Wayne 09:16:12 12/15/14 (0)
- You are consistently one of the most opinionated posters, with a long record - kuribo 06:10:44 12/08/14 (5)
- Just ignore him, Brad - Enzo 18:01:24 12/08/14 (0)
- RE: You are consistently one of the most opinionated posters, with a long record - morricab 07:02:21 12/08/14 (3)
- " I am happy to guide those who I am quite sure want a better sound than they have" oh please tell me... - kuribo 09:21:40 12/08/14 (2)
- RE: " I am happy to guide those who I am quite sure want a better sound than they have" oh please tell me... - morricab 03:33:51 12/09/14 (1)
- Good luck trying to extrapolate your results.... - kuribo 05:50:17 12/09/14 (0)
- RE: But - A.Wayne 16:11:41 12/05/14 (0)
- RE: But - A.Wayne 15:24:51 12/05/14 (0)
- RE: But - pictureguy 14:26:17 12/05/14 (1)
- RE: But - morricab 11:22:33 12/07/14 (0)
- additional link: - pictureguy 20:11:02 12/03/14 (0)