Amp/Preamp Asylum Looking for a new Amp or Preamp? If you're after tubes, post over here. |
|
In Reply to: Why don't audiophile pre's play rock well? posted by jeagle on July 19, 2014 at 19:10:18:
Another generally 'polite' set of preamps can be had from CJ. They sound wonderful but wouldn't be my first choice for a rock'n good time. If you want the polar opposite in dynamic slam factor you might look to Krell.
Also, I'm not sure if you're still running your First Watt J2 as described in your profile but here again is a good example of a smooth but not very rock'n amp, IMHO.
If you want to rock you want great dynamics and for that you want a decent amount of power, headroom, and a lively linestage.
P.S. My EAR 834P phono wasn't the most dynamic, extended, or transparent. With it's midrange emphasis it was addicting and smooth but not my first choice for rock, unless you wanted to smooth out the edge and brightness from early CDs. Similarly my Pass Aleph 3 and Aleph 30 were smooth but lacked dynamics for most of my rock.
A nice combo would be the hugely dynamic and robust sounding Cary SLP-05 tube linestage coupled to a hefty power amp like a Pass X250/X250.5. That would be magic! I know, 'cuz I had the SLP-05 and the smaller Pass X150.5.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Maybe not the EAR, but many do..... - AbeCollins 22:42:26 07/19/14 (17)
- RE: Maybe not the EAR, but many do..... - sharpnine 10:28:44 07/23/14 (1)
- RE: Maybe not the EAR, but many do..... - AbeCollins 16:30:28 07/23/14 (0)
- RE: Maybe not the EAR, but many do..... - fantja 10:08:54 07/22/14 (0)
- RE: Maybe not the EAR, but many do..... - jeagle 06:57:54 07/20/14 (13)
- The EAR is fine.. - PAR 07:50:52 07/20/14 (12)
- RE: The EAR is fine.. - jeagle 10:01:11 07/20/14 (0)
- RE: The EAR is fine.. - noway 08:58:23 07/20/14 (10)
- RE: The EAR is fine.. - jeagle 09:59:36 07/20/14 (9)
- RE: The EAR is fine.. - noway 14:02:23 07/20/14 (0)
- RE: The EAR is fine.. - Jack D II 13:05:17 07/20/14 (7)
- +1 on the CJ CT-5 - Mark Man 08:34:22 07/21/14 (5)
- RE: +1 on the CJ CT-5 - jeagle 12:58:43 07/21/14 (4)
- RE: +1 on the CJ CT-5 - Mark Man 13:30:20 07/21/14 (3)
- RE: +1 on the CJ CT-5 - AbeCollins 22:38:09 07/23/14 (2)
- RE: +1 on the CJ CT-5 - Jack D II 06:56:16 07/25/14 (1)
- RE: +1 on the CJ CT-5 - AbeCollins 16:35:40 07/25/14 (0)
- Thanks for all the feedback... - jeagle 05:46:57 07/21/14 (0)