Amp/Preamp Asylum Looking for a new Amp or Preamp? If you're after tubes, post over here. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Integrated amp suggestion posted by dvb on June 12, 2012 at 07:29:53:
The post was the opposite. The Marantnz was full sounding and the NAD had the thinner or cleaner sounding.
When ever some one posts about a stereo it always sounds like there is a major flaw or problem. In reality I really enjoy my Marantz PM8004 VERY much. My particular problem basically is I'm bored!!!!!! Gee - that isn't a common audio complaint.
I've owned the PM8004 for about 14 months and I feel it is an excellent integrated amp. It's qualities are that it is a very full lush sounding stereo. Side by side with a vintage Marantz 2330 (150wpc circa 1976), they almost sound the same. With the exception of the PM8004 being a lot cleaner sounding. The sound is very full with a tremendouns midrange. Not in your face midrange, but "full". It can handle very complex and difficult music cleanly. It also plays just as well at low levels as it does at high levels. Also it can be played very loud with NO problem.
the Cons of this unit are: it is a tad bit laid back. So if you have speakers with a polite top end this amp may be a problem. you need speakers with a good top end. The imaging is good, not the best I've ever heard but not bad. Dynamics are good, about the same as the NAD.
I would recommend it. Very good all around amp with NO glaring flaws.
If you need any additional info just email
charles
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Marantz PM8004 - airtime 15:37:25 06/12/12 (3)
- Perhaps "thin" was the wrong word. I also use the Marantz NA7004 Network player - airtime 08:26:59 06/13/12 (0)
- RE: Marantz PM8004 - Bill the K 20:33:26 06/12/12 (0)
- RE: Marantz PM8004 - dvb 17:45:32 06/12/12 (0)