Amp/Preamp Asylum

Ming Da MC-2A3 preamp schematic

68.183.226.193


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] Thread: [ Display  Email  Next ] [ Amp/Preamp Asylum ]

This Post Has Been Edited by the Author




MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Location: file:///C:/DE475053/MingDaMC-2A3.htm
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"

xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"
xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word"
xmlns:st1=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">







Initial impressions
name=3D"country-region"/>
name=3D"City"/>
name=3D"place"/>



Just wa=
nt to
share with fellow audiophiles a schematic of the Ming =
Da

MC-2A3 preamp and my experience as a curious owner.

&n=
bsp;

I have always been a believer of preamps being respons=
ible
for setting the tonal quality and power amps just delivering power with tra=
nsparency
and stability.

 

I have been a fan of 6SN7-based t=
ubed

preamps such as the MFA Luminescence, Melody 1688 Signature, and the Canary
CA906.  Violin music just soun=
ds
magical with those 3. preamps.style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  I also briefly owned a Cary SLP98P=
which
I was not too impressed with due to the blurry bass and somewhat AM radio-l=
ike
mid-highs.

 

The description of the preamp @ the manufacturer's web=
site
sucks.

There has not been a review of this unit on the several
major audio-rags or sites like 6moons or enjoythemusic=
.style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  The unit looks somewhat of a
monstrosity.

 

The Ming Da MC-2A3 struck =
me as an
interesting design (tube rectification and regulation, dual stage chokes, a=
nd
of course… 6SN7) and I had the opportunity to pick up one at a bargain
price.  The preamp arrived wit=
h the
cage detached from shipping and created a ding on one of the front support
“pillars”.  No big=
deal,
just cosmetics.

 

Stock tubes included Shuguangan> 2A3
rectifiers, and the rest of the tubes are EH.

 

Initial impre=
ssions

 

Out of the box and as expected, there is a sweetness t=
o the
violins that makes this preamp very desirable.style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  However, careful listening reveals=
the
same weaknesses as the SLP98P I owned previously.style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  Flabby and lethargic bass, a bit v=
eiled
mid-highs, no top end extension. 
The somewhat narrow soundstage destabilizes when playing complex
passages. Still the musicality is there that makes it an enjoyable preamp.<=
/p>

 

Off comes the=
bottom
cover

 

OK let’s take a look at what’s inside the
unit.  Wait… where are t=
he
Sprague vitamin Q gumdrops and the Mundorf M-ca=
ps in
the advertisements?  All I see=
is
run of the mill SCR-MKP caps.  >Oh
well no problem, I was gonna swap them out with=
my
collection of Mundorf Silver Oil, =3DSpellE>Dynamicaps,
Jensen Copper-oil, or Hovland llE>Musicaps
anyway.

 

The B+ power supply sure looks impressive. class=3DGramE>L-C-L-C-[series-pass-regulator]-C-R-C+by=
pass
.style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  Wow… but wait… howR=
17;s
the filament power supply hooked up?

There seems to be 2?!=
 
Nice bridge-C-R-C to the 6SN7s but wait… it supplies it with an
unregulated 13V to be share serially among 2 6SN7s!style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  That means my left channel 6SN7 has
filament voltage of 6.5 on a good day at 0-6.5V and the other tube has it
raised to 6.5-13V!  That’=
;s not
a good design imes New Roman";
mso-hansi-font-family:"Times New Roman";mso-char-type:symbol;mso-symbol-fon=
t-family:
Wingdings'>ings'>L
style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  The 6922 side is even worse, 20 vo=
lts
shared between 3 6922s, that means one channel would have its filament at
absolute potential starting as high as 13.5V.style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  

 

Looking at the circuitry, the 6SN7s are in SRPP class=3DSpellE>config, no surprises there.style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  The middle 6922 is the cathode fol=
lower,
sounds logical.  The 2 6922s o=
n the
side are a bit idiosyncratic.  
½ of each “side” 6922 serve as the constant curre=
nt
source to each half of the the middle 6922.style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  the oth=
er
½ of each of the “side” 6922s is the top tube of the
bootstrapped cathode follower for the middle 6922.style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  Seems convoluted enough but sure c=
onvinced
me that a lot of thought has been put into the circuit (well… read on=
).

 

Shotgun Appro=
ach

 

I decided to start with a shotgun approach by taking o=
ut the
SCR MKP output caps ( was 2.2uF paralleled with =
some
PIO-like 0.01uF) and replace them with Mundorf =
2.2uF
Silver Oils.  The 0.22uF caps
between the cathode follower and the top 6922 was also replaced with Jensen
0.22uF Copper Oil.  The sound =
opened
up quite a bit and every sounds more well
defined.  However, it came at a
price of a pronounced mid-high and the bass is equally as flabby.style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  I believe the change has more to d=
o with
the output cap than the cap between the cathode follower and the upper foll=
ower
tube’s grid.

 

Schematicsp>

 

Thanks to a fellow audiophile who graciously shared wi=
th me
a copy of the schematics.

I looked at the 2 High Voltage bypass caps closest to =
the
6SN7s and right at the regulator outputs and according to the schematic they
are 100uF 400V rated.  So in w=
ent to
Blackgate 100uF caps in place of the blue 150uF=
caps
marked Philips and BC (they looked identical and based on the markings on t=
he
cap I have reasonable suspicion that they are some Kung E>Pao
Mushu counterfeit caps).style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  As expected the bass got deeper and
fuller but it still sounds slow and muddy.=
 
There is a slight incoherence in the mid-high that I associated with=
the
0.1uF bypass cap across strapped from B+ to ground.style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  I came across several class=3DSpellE>writeups that Blackgate <=
span
class=3DSpellE>lytics do not like to be bypassed so I took it out.pan
style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  Marginal improvement I called it. =

 

Colored sound=
and
lethargic bass

 

“So why didn’t you wait a few weeks to let
everything run in?”  You=
might
ask.

While I believe in running in I refuse to believe in t=
he
400+ hours of break in time.  =
If
something does not sound decisively better than the old component class=3DGramE>a after few hours of run-in.style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  It’s likely your mind playing
games on you cos your ears are getting used to =
being
pierced.  Anyway, the preamp s=
till
sounds lethargic and presents a somewhat colored midrange.

 

Why so finick=
y about
tubes?

 

The same audiophile who provided me with the schematic=
s was
very kind and generous to loan me some of his prized collection of tubes.pan
style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  So the MC-2A3 is now equipped with=
RCA
2A3s, an uber expensive Philips pellE>Miniwatt
EL34 as regulator series pass (yes!), my trusty RCA 6SN7GT smoke as compara=
tor,
and mega-expensive pinched waist 6922s as followers and constant current so=
urce
(yes!). 

 

For the 6922 in the input/gain stage I tube-rolled amo=
ng
aged Sovtek (don’t laugh, they ARE compet=
ent),
Ken Rad, RCA-smoke, place
w:st=3D"on">Sylvania
stubby chrome top, class=3DSpellE>Raytheons, RCA redbase, a=
nd CBS
6SN7GT and CBS 5692. 

Each set of 6SN7s gave it a different sound as expecte=
d, and
I won’t go into the details. 
But what I found was that with certain 6SN7s the preamp sounds
WEIRD.  Also with some known g=
ood,
known quiet 6SN7s the preamp started to hum as if grounding is a problem.pan
style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  The midrange gets additional harmo=
nic coloration
which I know from using the tubes in other applications is definitely NOT a
characteristic of that tube.  =
So
onto the bench it goes and we checked for gremlins.

 

Oscillation!<=
o:p>

 

We looked at the output of the 6SN7 to the 6922 middle=
tube
and found there is SERIOUS oscillation when RCA smoke-glass 6SN7 mates with=
my
(couldn’t resist so paid the big bucks) pinch-waist 6922.style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  A quick look at the schematics rev=
eal
that Ming Da uses a 220Ohm grid stop resistor b=
etween
the 2 stages, that’s about 1/10th of what we’d expec=
t in
a circuit like this.  Out goes=
the
stock 220Ohm and in comes a 2kOhm grid stop.style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  No observable high-end roll off th=
ere
but the strange noise is gone and the voltage measures normal.style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  Now I can at least seriously evalu=
ate
the tube combos without this tube-capacitance-matching problem.

 

Is that the o=
utput
caps?

 

So back to the pronounced mid-high=
s.
style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  After running the ellE>Mundorfs
for a few weeks the preamp still shows this tonal imbalance so I swapped in=
2
2uF Dynamicaps.
Initially it sounded more buttoned down but the air and decay went
away.  No my cup of tea.

 

Faulty Jensen=
, a
blessing in disguise

 

At around the same time the preamp started to emit a
“puff puff putt putt=

sound and it was traced to a faulty Jensen cap in the boot-strap-follower u=
pper
tube.  Out goes that cap and t=
he
preamp actually sounds cleaner.  an>class=3DGramE>Swapped in an Auricap 0.33uF, and=
then an
Obligato 0.1uF with no success.
style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  Everytimean> that
cap (actually it’s 2, one per 6922 on each side) is in place the
coloration comes back.

 

Looking at page 168 of
“Valve Amplifiers, Third Edition by Morgan Jones”style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  the upper tube of that bootstrapped
cathode follower is for distortion cancellation but even Morgan Jones comme=
nted
that it “invites further problems” and “requires a separa=
te
heater supply” which the MC-2A3 certainly does not have.style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'> 

 

So I decided to leave that cap OUT.

 

Experiments w=
ith NFB

 

It’s common assumption that =
preamps
with NFB gives
a punchier sound.&nb=
sp;
So I proceeded to investigate whether a small amount of NFB, impleme=
nted
using a cap and a resistor looping either at the output cap or before the
output cap might serve to tighten up bass.

 

I tried resistor values ranging from 25 to 80kOhms at =
10k
steps and various capacitor sizes without success.style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  Too high a resistor value (low NFB)
gives no effect, and once the value is small enough (50k) to tighten the ba=
ss
it makes the preamp sound nervous and constricted.style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  No go with NFB.

 

Scrutinize the
schematic

 

Running out of ideas, I decided to spend some time loo=
king
at the schematic.  The unit th=
at I
got as well as the units depicted in THIS picture

http://www.pacificvalve.us/images/MC_2A3_Inside.JPG

and here:

http://www.audiocostruzioni.com/r_s/pre/ming-da-mc-2a3=
/mc-2a3.htm

do not show the 5.1kOhm res=
istor per
the schematic on the B+ rail separating the 6SN7 stage and the 6922 follower
stage.  The way my MC-2A3 was =
wired
the resulting B+ to the 6SN7 be the same as the 6922s top triode.

According to “Beginner's Guide to Tube Audio Des=
ign by
Bruce Rozenblit”, this kind of an arrange=
ment
could even result in coupling between the 2 anodes.

 

My unit has the green 300Ohm resistor but the unit dep=
icted
here

http://www.audiocostruzioni.com/r_s/pre/ming-da-mc-2a3=
/dentro.jpg

does not have that resistor=
.

The 300Ohm resistor in my unit (and possibly all units
coming into the USst1:place>)
separates the regulated B+ from the rail going to the tubes.style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  This drops the 220V regulated outp=
ut to
about 202V or so.  No problems
here.  BUT if you take a closer
look, this means the 100uF filtering capacitor (now a =
blackgate
)
at the output of the regulator has to go through the 300Ohm before getting =
to
the plates of 2 6922 and 2 6SN7. 
With this arrangement, the only bypass cap directly serving t=
hose
tubes would be one single 100uF lytic class=3DGramE>( Blackgate WKZ 100uF 500V=
).

 

The photo of the European version looks different.style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>   There is no 300Ohm resistor
separating the output of the regulator and the 6922 anodes.style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  A 5.1kOhm resistor separates the 6=
922
anode rail from the 6SN7 anode rail. 
This means (and it agrees with the schematic) that the 6922 sees 220=
V B+
and the 6SN7 sees 190V.  This =
prevents
anode coupling between the gain stage and the cathode follower.style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>   The 6SN7s also get full acce=
ss to
100uF of bypass and the 6922s get their share of a full 100uF of bypass.an
style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  This all makes a lot more sense.pan
style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  It’s time to follow the sche=
matic
and start making corrections.

 

With this change to make the circuit a big step closer=
to
the schematic, the midrange coloration (an occasional overtone noticeable in
complex passages) is completely gone. 

 

Film caps>

 

I’m sure everyone has come across postings bashi=
ng the
lytic caps.&nb=
sp;
Sure I’d like to use film caps for bypass but how do I fit a t=
otal
of 200uF or more into that chassis? 
Also since Blackgates are known for thei=
r deep
bass will I be going the wrong direction by attempting to replace the 2 an
class=3DSpellE>blackgates with film caps?style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  There is definitely enough bass fr=
om the
MC-2A3 now but the problem is with the quality of bass I am getting.style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  I am looking for tight bass with s=
lam,
and a clear after-decay, not the “farty&#=
8221;
bass I am getting.

 

Fix the obvio=
us and
snub them Zeners!

 

While trying to figure out how to squeeze 4 33uF film =
caps
into the chassis, I notice that there are 2 (well technically 3) places whe=
re class=3DSpellE>zener diodes are used.'> 
Zeners are known for their diode noises =
but
they are a necessary evil for voltage reference to the constant current sou=
rce
and the main B+ voltage regulator.  <=
/span>class=3DSpellE>Zener
noises are usually snubbed by placing a cap acr=
oss
the zener.&nbs=
p;
The zener used in the 6922 constant curr=
ent
source for each channel has 2 stage snubbing.style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  Butstyle=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  70V 220uF llE>lytics
are used.  I duct-taped it wit=
h a
cascade of film caps so as to ensure no high frequency >zener
noise gets into the CCS.  Also=
I
noticed the zener snubber<=
/span>
in my unit is wired across 1 diode only and not both as depicted in the
schematic.  I ADDED another ca=
p just
to make very sure there is no zener noise getti=
ng
into the EL34 series pass.  The
result was not dramatic but noticeable.&nb=
sp;
The noise floor was lowered and I can hear more details.

 

Film caps for=
bypass

 

After I figured out how to physically squeeze in 3 an
class=3DSpellE>Solen 33uF caps, I used them in parallel for
post-regulation B+ on the 6922 rail before hitting getting to the 6SN7s whi=
ch
are still bypassed by a Blackgate.style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  The net capacitance there is not l=
owered
so I did not expect any drop in bass response.

 

Even without any warm up I notice that there is an
improvement that is not subtle.  an>The
lethargic sound is gone.  Dyna=
mic
contrast is outright scary with absolutely no sacrifice in smoothness or
coherence.  This is a much big=
ger
improvement than swapping in Mundorfs and class=3DSpellE>Blackgates
in place of the stock caps.

 

1 More RC fil=
ter
stage may not improve sound

 

Time for another fancy idea.>style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  Why not put back the 300Ohm resist=
or and
put back the Blackgate 100uF lE>lytic
to ADD another C-R filtering stage before the 6922 rail?style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  Due to space constraints, I’=
d end
up with only 66uF servicing the 6922 (2 Solens
instead of 3).

The result?&nbs=
p;
A slight but noticeable incoherence and class=3DSpellE>roughess in the mid-highs.style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  That’s exactly the opposite =
of
what I’d expect from an additional C-R filter.

 

I want to keep 100uF bypassing the 6922s anyway so I e=
nded
up taking out the 300 Ohm resistor which is not in the schematic anyway.

 

Ripple-phobia=

 

I was also surprised at how the preamp reacted to diff=
erent
EL34s as regulators.  A good
regulator should dissipate incoming power and provide smooth constant volta=
ge
to the B+.  The EL34 is not
“playing music” so why is the preamp sensitive to that tube.an
style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  Also why did a Groove Tube E34LS h=
igh
current EL34 which is supposed to have great heat dissipation sound bad as a
regulator in my preamp?

 

I was suspicious with the quality of the choke-filtere=
d high
voltage going into the regulator and I came across this posting

 

href=3D"http://user.tninet.se/~vhw129w/mt_audio_design/tweakpage_dac.htm">h=
ttp://user.tninet.se/~vhw129w/mt_audio_design/tweakpage_dac.htm

 

So I decided to squeeze a small film cap =3DGramE>(
0.47uF
Auricap) right between the EL34&#=
8217;s
plate and ground.  In theory t=
his
cap should serve as a fast reacting capacitor filtering out any high freque=
ncy
noise or small ripple going into the regulator.

 

Drum RollR=
30;.

 

Voila!  <=
span
class=3DGramE>Another MAJOR improvement.style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  Now I get copious amounts of detai=
l,
air, decay, limitless dynamic headroom and soundstage stability.style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  Never had I thought that DC supply
pre-regulation is THAT important. 
(Are those “BC lytic caps”
fake).  Th=
e preamp
us now uncolored and coherent.

 

I guess what I really should have done is replace the =
2 blue
300uF 400V lytic caps with Nichicon.style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  Duct tape approach works… at=
least
for now.

 

This was indeed an interesting journey in audio.style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  The fact that the MC-2A3 uses
point-to-point wiring gave me much confidence in trying certain things.style=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'>  I absolutely need to give credit t=
o the
authors of these 2 books

Beginner's Guide to Tube Au=
dio
Design by Bruce Rozenblitstyle=3D'mso-spacerun:yes'> 

Valve Amplifiers, Third Edi=
tion by
Morgan Jones 

 

 

 






Edits: 06/13/08   06/13/08   06/13/08   06/13/08   08/10/08   08/17/08   08/17/08   08/17/08

Follow Ups: