|
Planar Speaker Asylum Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences. |
|
|
|
Planar Speaker Asylum Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences. |
|
In Reply to: Re: Introduction and tweak inquiry posted by Cory M. on January 1, 2006 at 20:51:20:
Thanks Cory, good point about the efficiency. I don't know if the baffle makes a significant contribution to that or not. The early SMG is 24 inches wide and to me (from a stricktly asthetic point of view) the proportions of the panel don't look good. The width makes them look really squat for the height. The slimmer models are more appealing in that respect.Cutting down to 18" would take 3" off each side, leaving about 3".
One tweeter is drying now and I'll fire it up later this morning.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Introduction and tweak inquiry - tjfuss 05:12:59 01/02/06 (2)
- Yeah, I think they look a little disproportionate too, I prefer the tall, slim blonde umm.. ones better. (nt) - Cory M. 13:52:04 01/02/06 (1)
- Only if they have a "forward upper mid-range" :-)) nt - andyr 15:50:13 01/02/06 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
