In Reply to: RE: 800 W/ch for maggie 20.1 posted by dromney on August 28, 2016 at 13:57:01:
I suggest you will get an additional increase in SQ from putting your 2 Macs back into stereo mode and replacing the external passive bass/mid XO with an active XO. Something like a Marchand, if you want an analogue XO ... but I would recommend a miniDSP 10x10Hd unit (which I have just bought to replace my 3-way analogue active XOs) as it gives you DSP to correct room-mode nodes as well as the bass LP/mid HP XO. It will allow you to go 3-way active in the future, if you decide you want to do this, and offers the luxury of having 4 different confg setups loaded that you can flip between, on the fly. :-))
Regards,
Andy
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: 800 W/ch for maggie 20.1 - andyr 02:52:35 08/29/16 (10)
- Biamping for maggie 20.1 with two macs vs bridged amps - Satie 16:40:02 08/29/16 (7)
- RE: Biamping for maggie 20.1 with two macs vs bridged amps - dromney 09:26:44 09/04/16 (5)
- RE: Biamping for maggie 20.1 with two macs vs bridged amps - Satie 20:30:04 09/04/16 (2)
- RE: Biamping for maggie 20.1 with two macs vs bridged amps - dromney 20:30:37 09/05/16 (1)
- RE: Biamping for maggie 20.1 with two macs vs bridged amps - Satie 21:10:40 09/05/16 (0)
- RE: Biamping for maggie 20.1 with two macs vs bridged amps - macmagman 12:11:43 09/04/16 (1)
- RE: Biamping for maggie 20.1 with two macs vs bridged amps - Davey 16:34:36 09/04/16 (0)
- You are right - leave DSP out, if you want ultimate fidelity! nt - RealStereo 10:40:35 08/30/16 (0)
- RE: 800 W/ch for maggie 20.1 - neolith 06:42:12 08/29/16 (1)
- RE: miniDSP "noisy"? - andyr 15:34:01 08/29/16 (0)