|
Planar Speaker Asylum Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences. |
|
|
|
Planar Speaker Asylum Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences. |
|
In Reply to: RE: MGIII active crossover? posted by Skeepowder1@aol.com on August 4, 2016 at 07:08:47:
I would go for the lower value (300 Hz). Again remember these recommendations are approximate and were setup for the available active crossover units when the III came out (over 30 years ago). OTOH they should work satisfactorily and you will be shocked at the improvement with active biamping.
While I can understand your desire to use the XM-9 (Marchand makes great products), we have moved into the 21st century and several inmates have gone to using the mini-DSP which is reasonably priced and gives you incredible options and controls. Perhaps some others can post their opinions and experience with these products.
"Our head is round in order to allow our thoughts to change direction." Francis Picabia
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: MGIII active crossover? - neolith 09:25:54 08/04/16 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
