In Reply to: RE: Active bi-amping of ET LFT-8b posted by BDP24 on June 29, 2016 at 18:15:52:
I didn't remember the LFT8 mids being that long, IIRC the TIV mids were 48 or 50". and I thought they were too short. I was intending to go for 8 drivers per side but stopped at 6 since that already did all I wanted from it and didn't require a new frame.
There are other issues, The sensitivity is >91 db for the Neo8 array - supposed to calculate out to 95-6db but I have doubts about that figure. vs 83 db for the LFT8 mids, the other thing was max spl which came out to 1% THD @110db 1m 500hz and up on the neo8 array again with the caveat that it is from memory from BG white papers they pulled off the web years ago. The ET mids reach excursion limits in the low 100s db - someone's measurement I don't remember where from..
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Active bi-amping of ET LFT-8b - Satie 20:13:56 06/29/16 (24)
- RE: Active bi-amping of ET LFT-8b - Roger Gustavsson 01:44:39 06/30/16 (23)
- RE: Active bi-amping of ET LFT-8b - BDP24 05:09:46 06/30/16 (22)
- RE: Active bi-amping of ET LFT-8b - BDP24 06:52:46 06/30/16 (20)
- RE: Active bi-amping of ET LFT-8b - BDP24 07:09:32 06/30/16 (19)
- RE: Active bi-amping of ET LFT-8b - Davey 07:24:28 06/30/16 (18)
- RE: Active bi-amping of ET LFT-8b - BDP24 06:40:22 07/01/16 (14)
- RE: Active bi-amping of ET LFT-8b - Satie 11:39:27 07/01/16 (13)
- RE: Active bi-amping of ET LFT-8b - BDP24 03:38:39 07/02/16 (12)
- RE: Active bi-amping of ET LFT-8b - Satie 09:36:43 07/02/16 (11)
- RE: Active bi-amping of ET LFT-8b - BDP24 16:28:27 07/02/16 (10)
- RE: Active bi-amping of ET LFT-8b - Satie 00:14:24 07/03/16 (9)
- RE: Active bi-amping of ET LFT-8b - BDP24 03:18:40 07/03/16 (8)
- RE: Active bi-amping of ET LFT-8b - Satie 03:44:44 07/03/16 (7)
- RE: Active bi-amping of ET LFT-8b - BDP24 13:29:31 07/05/16 (6)
- RE: Active bi-amping of ET LFT-8b - Satie 21:00:18 07/05/16 (5)
- RE: Active bi-amping of ET LFT-8b - BDP24 16:11:14 07/07/16 (4)
- RE: Active bi-amping of ET LFT-8b - Satie 07:04:28 07/08/16 (3)
- RE: Active bi-amping of ET LFT-8b - BDP24 14:11:48 07/11/16 (2)
- RE: Active bi-amping of ET LFT-8b - Satie 19:20:39 07/11/16 (1)
- RE: Active bi-amping of ET LFT-8b - BDP24 01:53:05 07/13/16 (0)
- RE: Active bi-amping of ET LFT-8b - BDP24 07:54:37 06/30/16 (2)
- RE: Active bi-amping of ET LFT-8b - Satie 08:30:10 06/30/16 (1)
- RE: Active bi-amping of ET LFT-8b - BDP24 18:49:31 06/30/16 (0)
- RE: Active bi-amping of ET LFT-8b - Davey 06:12:20 06/30/16 (0)