In Reply to: RE: The MMG Harmonic Distortion Conspiracy Theory...mostly tongue-in-cheek, long posted by old guy 42 on March 22, 2015 at 09:26:43:
A mostly tongue in cheek Harmonic Distortion Conspiracy Theory that's not really a conspiracy. Got it. :)Isn't it obvious that my "engineering dogma" is interested in the part that's NOT tongue-in-cheek? :) My goodness.
What did you do to solve this problem? Or are you still experiencing it? Those are the real questions here.
If I had the transducer in my listening room I could certainly find the issue for you, but it's a bit difficult to troubleshoot via forum messaging with all sorts of irrelevant information included.He did make mention that your two tests were done on different days. It's possible that may have invalidated your testing scheme. This type of thing requires a strict discipline in testing if valid conclusions are to be made. So, it's possible your transducer has no problem.....just the inherent distortion.
Make sense?Dave.
Edits: 03/22/15 03/22/15 03/22/15
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: The MMG Harmonic Distortion Conspiracy Theory...mostly tongue-in-cheek, long - Davey 09:32:47 03/22/15 (5)
- RE: The MMG Harmonic Distortion Conspiracy Theory...mostly tongue-in-cheek, long - JBen 10:37:58 03/22/15 (0)
- RE: The MMG Harmonic Distortion Conspiracy Theory...mostly tongue-in-cheek, long - old guy 42 10:29:13 03/22/15 (3)
- RE: The MMG Harmonic Distortion Conspiracy Theory...mostly tongue-in-cheek, long - Davey 11:30:18 03/22/15 (2)
- RE: The MMG Harmonic Distortion Conspiracy Theory...mostly tongue-in-cheek, long - old guy 42 12:09:59 03/22/15 (1)
- RE: The MMG Harmonic Distortion Conspiracy Theory...mostly tongue-in-cheek, long - Davey 13:37:08 03/22/15 (0)