In Reply to: "Hardwoods are not necessarily 'hard' " ... posted by andyr on March 4, 2015 at 17:24:05:
As near as I can tell,
This link is Accurate.
It hinges on Balsa being an 'angiosperm'
I learned this particular bit of weirdness in WOODSHOP while going over just what wood IS. how it looks and some of the engineering aspects of HOW it works.
That's how come I'm so BIG on wood when it comes to 'reframe' of Maggies! Most everything I learned in class Jives with what PG used to rant about.
Too much is never enough
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: "Hardwoods are not necessarily 'hard' " ... - pictureguy 18:04:48 03/04/15 (5)
- RE: "Hardwoods are not necessarily 'hard' " ... - andyr 18:20:57 03/04/15 (4)
- RE: "Hardwoods are not necessarily 'hard' " ... - Roger Gustavsson 06:01:14 03/05/15 (0)
- RE: "Hardwoods are not necessarily 'hard' " ... - pictureguy 21:18:46 03/04/15 (2)
- RE: "Hardwoods are not necessarily 'hard' " ... - Voncarlos 19:33:16 03/05/15 (1)
- RE: "Hardwoods are not necessarily 'hard' " ... - pictureguy 19:37:08 03/05/15 (0)