In Reply to: Emminent Tech LFT-8b versus quad esl 63 posted by digda_beat on February 13, 2015 at 02:48:14:
Completely different approach and overall sound, with some common characteristics.
My observations are below
ELS63 vs LFT-VIII
Differences:
Smoother - Neutral
Top end subjectively reticent - more prominent
No low bass - goes quite deep
Limited maximum SPL - can play quite loud
Slightly easier to drive - needs slightly more power
Narrow sweet spot - not that narrow sweet spot
Maintenance relatively expensive - practically no maintenance
Fairly expensive - fairly cheap
More cohesive - less cohesive from bass to low mid-range.
Need quite a space behind to work - need less space
Common points
Both have quick natural instrument attack
Both are very coherent speakers particularly from low mid-range up
Both are very musical/engaging speakers.
Both work best with tube amps
Both need some space around
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane."
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Emminent Tech LFT-8b versus quad esl 63 - Stale 11:35:16 02/22/15 (1)
- RE: Emminent Tech LFT-8b versus quad esl 63 - KotBegemotNY@gmail.com 17:42:22 03/22/15 (0)