In Reply to: RE: Can you damage a quad esl panel in transport? posted by kentaja on September 21, 2014 at 06:24:27:
So...this "Quad themselves addressed the issue with the introduction of the ESL-63 USA Monitor, which featured a more substantial frame."
and this..."It was modelled on the more rugged "professional" model that had been created for the recording division of Philips that possessed metal grilles and a steel frame (instead of aluminium)."
and this..."The US Monitor appeared to have more upper midrange and less bass than my old ESL-63s. This may represent some lack of rigidity in the older Quads that adds an added "whumph" in the midbass area, a byproduct of the less rigid speaker frame's vibration."
Are all wrong. I guess I stand corrected.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Can you damage a quad esl panel in transport? - louie3 08:08:14 09/21/14 (6)
- RE: Can you damage a quad esl panel in transport? - kentaja 07:04:32 09/22/14 (0)
- RE: My 2 cents comment - M. Vidal 18:19:54 09/21/14 (4)
- RE: My 2 cents comment - kentaja 07:10:44 09/22/14 (0)
- RE: My 2 cents comment - M. Vidal 18:22:10 09/21/14 (2)
- RE: My 2 cents comment - airheadair 15:49:19 09/22/14 (1)
- RE: My 2 cents comment - kentaja 15:57:02 09/22/14 (0)