In Reply to: RE: PLLXO biamp + passive pre-amp on MMGs: a nice little surprise posted by JBen on August 13, 2014 at 20:43:15:
Back to some pesky facts regarding PLLXO's and passive preamps.
I've posted regarding PLLXO's for many years on this forum and nearly always I've qualified my statements with something like...."PLLXO's variables must be understood.....", "you can't easily transfer to a different power amp combination......", "source resistance must be low.....", or various other qualifiers along those lines. That doesn't mean they won't work.
If you can find a post by me where I declared a "PLLXO/Passive-pre combo a practical impossibility," I'd like to see it.
For you to intimate that I'm not a fan of PLLXO's is simply silly. I lost count, but I think there are probably about fifty Maggies users out there who have successfully bi-amped their systems with a PLLXO I optimized for them.
Dave.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: PLLXO biamp + passive pre-amp on MMGs: a nice little surprise - Davey 08:58:53 08/14/14 (5)
- RE: PLLXO biamp + passive pre-amp on MMGs: a nice little surprise - JBen 11:38:49 08/14/14 (4)
- RE: PLLXO biamp + passive pre-amp on MMGs: a nice little surprise - Davey 12:19:37 08/15/14 (3)
- RE: PLLXO biamp + passive pre-amp on MMGs: a nice little surprise - JBen 22:03:40 08/15/14 (2)
- RE: PLLXO biamp + passive pre-amp on MMGs: a nice little surprise - Davey 06:51:17 08/16/14 (1)
- My lunch break dessert - JBen 10:21:42 08/18/14 (0)