In Reply to: RE: that is one problem I am not likely to be able to do... at least for awhile after getting the 20.7s posted by Ron D on December 4, 2013 at 14:01:01:
I have heard neither the 20.7s nor the 7Bs so can't offer a direct opinion - but have heard both the 3.6s and the 3.7s at length, and suffice to say that I would not have purchased the 3.6s but love the 3.7s - there is a major difference in the two speakers. If I were in the market for the larger speakers I probably would gravitate to the 20.7s.
IMO, this was true of every Maggie speakers before the 3.7s and the other current models (based on hearing quite of few samples over the years) - they were generically warm but not completely tonally accurate nor revealing - the generic warmth tended to obfuscate detail.. The 3.7s are tonally accurate and revealing of detail.
YMMV, of course.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- 3.7s vs 3.7s - TGR 14:35:37 12/04/13 (2)
- RE: 3.7s vs 3.7s - ahendler 15:54:32 12/04/13 (1)
- RE: 3.7s vs 3.7s - Barry 18:31:08 12/05/13 (0)