In Reply to: Interesting question - hopefully you will get more input than mine. :-)) ... posted by andyr on March 19, 2012 at 15:27:43:
It's pure speculation. The 3.7 reportedly uses flat foil (QR) rather than round wire for the bass and mid-driver. Whether this is a big advantage or not, I can't say. I would expect that foil would eliminate the problem with delamination - has anyone had their 1.6 tweeters delam? Intuitively it would seem that having the drivers designed the same would make for better integration but I don't know if having both foil is any better than having them both with round wire. Integration with the tweeter may be better with the QR drivers but I don't know that.
The other feature of the 3.7 is the use of 1st order xo's which have lots of theoretical advantages over other types of filters. The downside is a shallow slope so the drivers extend beyond the normal bounds. However the Maggie drivers have quite a good range and don't suffer from edge effects, etc. like cones, so this is a minor drawback.
Biamping 3.6's and doing some other tweaks definitely improves their already prodigous sound. Biamping is tricky but if you get the slopes and crossover correct, then the gains are significant and the sound is going to be hard to beat.
The question then remains how much bang do you get for your buck. Modifying 3.6's by either triamping or rebuilding the internal xo and biamping and building new frames and stands is going to be close to the price range of the new 3.7's. If you get the 3.7's you can push them further later on with wood frames (they cannot be multi-amped) and better crossover components.
Bottom line, you won't go wrong either way. If it were me, I would go with the 3.7's and plan on moding them down the road. OTOH when I was contemplating replacing my IIb's with to be modified IIIa's or stock 3.6's, I went with the IIIa's.
"Our head is round in order to allow our thoughts to change direction." Francis Picabia
Edits: 03/19/12
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Interesting question - hopefully you will get more input than mine. :-)) ... - neolith 17:27:40 03/19/12 (28)
- Valid points but ... - andyr 03:50:46 03/20/12 (1)
- RE: Valid points but ... - josh358 09:44:09 03/21/12 (0)
- RE: Interesting question - hopefully you will get more input than mine. :-)) ... - josh358 19:22:13 03/19/12 (25)
- "I'm not sure that the 3.6 would allow you to use single pole crossovers without compromising performance" ... - andyr 03:42:06 03/20/12 (24)
- RE: "I'm not sure that the 3.6 would allow you to use single pole crossovers without compromising performance" ... - josh358 10:00:47 03/20/12 (14)
- RE: "I'm not sure that the 3.6 would allow you to use single pole crossovers without compromising performance" ... - Satie 10:16:26 03/22/12 (1)
- RE: "I'm not sure that the 3.6 would allow you to use single pole crossovers without compromising performance" ... - josh358 16:02:09 03/22/12 (0)
- RE: "I'm not sure that the 3.6 would allow you to use single pole crossovers without compromising performance" ... - Dawnrazor 10:03:25 03/20/12 (11)
- RE: "I'm not sure that the 3.6 would allow you to use single pole crossovers without compromising performance" ... - josh358 10:29:52 03/20/12 (10)
- 6dB slopes ... - andyr 12:35:30 03/20/12 (9)
- That's the spirit laddie! - JBen 13:23:28 03/20/12 (8)
- Measurements - probably not, mate! Could nae be bothered :-)) ... - andyr 14:56:44 03/20/12 (7)
- RE: Measurements - probably not, mate! Could nae be bothered :-)) ... - JBen 17:42:27 03/20/12 (3)
- "The difference is in the soundstage each one projects." ... - andyr 18:18:53 03/20/12 (2)
- RE: "The difference is in the soundstage each one projects." ... - josh358 09:49:05 03/21/12 (0)
- RE: "The difference is in the soundstage each one projects." ... - JBen 18:34:20 03/20/12 (0)
- RE: Measurements - probably not, mate! Could nae be bothered :-)) ... - Dawnrazor 17:27:23 03/20/12 (2)
- "I thought you had to reverse the polarity even on the 1st order slopes"??? ... - andyr 17:35:53 03/20/12 (1)
- RE: "I thought you had to reverse the polarity even on the 1st order slopes"??? ... - neolith 06:01:55 03/22/12 (0)
- RE: "I'm not sure that the 3.6 would allow you to use single pole crossovers without compromising performance" ... - tyu 08:50:20 03/20/12 (0)
- RE: "I'm not sure that the 3.6 would allow you to use single pole crossovers without compromising performance" ... - Dawnrazor 08:46:25 03/20/12 (7)
- RE: "I'm not sure that the 3.6 would allow you to use single pole crossovers without compromising performance" ... - patmacav 20:27:26 03/21/12 (0)
- They started to grow on him 3 months later - sbrians 17:06:32 03/20/12 (5)
- RE: They started to grow on him 3 months later - Dawnrazor 04:01:01 03/21/12 (4)
- RE: They started to grow on him 3 months later - old guy 42 09:23:18 03/21/12 (3)