In Reply to: RE: 3.6R "Shoot for the Moon" Internal Passive XO posted by neolith on March 18, 2012 at 15:12:46:
Neolith, Thanks as always. I'm a fan and read your posts because I am bound to learn something worthwhile. While this passive XO seems expensive and is, active quad amping (!!!) based on my other equipment would have been a whole lot more. I really think this will be personally satisfying once broken in. That last little bit of hash from the caps is now gone. I got a really good discount on the parts which helped. I'll see if I can scrape up another $10 for the chokes. Have considered them but don't live in a high RF area.
Kindest regards, Barry
Edits: 03/18/12
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: 3.6R "Shoot for the Moon" Internal Passive XO - Barry 18:42:52 03/18/12 (2)
- RE: 3.6R "Shoot for the Moon" Internal Passive XO - neolith 18:53:44 03/18/12 (1)
- Another reason why people are afraid of the dentist! (nt) - Barry 18:55:53 03/18/12 (0)