In Reply to: RE: Should we send a "representative" to Magnepan? posted by esande on October 15, 2011 at 04:29:00:
I was just thinking of passing along any questions, suggestions, and criticisms, without regard to whether they're consensus views. As you say, looking for consensus would be like herding cats, though some opinions are shared by a number of people, e.g., I've seen several posts lamenting the loss of bi-amping capability, and I know that you're not alone in your concern about quality.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Should we send a "representative" to Magnepan? - josh358 10:06:17 10/15/11 (11)
- RE: Should we send a "representative" to Magnepan? - gentlegiantfan 09:57:19 10/17/11 (4)
- RE: Should we send a "representative" to Magnepan? - josh358 13:56:26 10/17/11 (0)
- RE: Should we send a "representative" to Magnepan? - DaveStL 11:34:26 10/17/11 (1)
- RE: Should we send a "representative" to Magnepan? - josh358 14:12:28 10/17/11 (0)
- RE: Should we send a "representative" to Magnepan? - pictureguy 10:37:07 10/17/11 (0)
- RE: Should we send a "representative" to Magnepan? - pictureguy 15:03:24 10/16/11 (5)
- RE: Should we send a "representative" to Magnepan? - josh358 18:46:51 10/16/11 (4)
- RE: Should we send a "representative" to Magnepan? - pictureguy 23:52:47 10/16/11 (3)
- RE: Should we send a "representative" to Magnepan? - josh358 19:55:24 10/17/11 (2)
- RE: Should we send a "representative" to Magnepan? - pictureguy 21:13:19 10/17/11 (1)
- RE: Should we send a "representative" to Magnepan? - josh358 06:55:45 10/18/11 (0)