98.247.165.94
| '); } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } // End --> |
In Reply to: RE: Well, the SMGa is said to be more efficient than the 1.6. posted by esande on November 07, 2009 at 12:36:26
Magnet changes, panel size, motor configuration, etc, etc, can all have an effect on system efficiency. Crossovers can not.As the designs have evolved crossover changes may be required to tailor/flatten the frequency response, balance the tweeter and woofer, etc, etc, but they can't alter the basic efficiency of the design. That's locked in when the transducer unit leaves its fabrication area and continues on to be assembled into the rest of the system.
I certainly wouldn't make any conclusions on the engineering prowess in White Bear Lake based on binding posts. :)
Cheers,
Dave.
Edits: 11/08/09Follow Ups:
Post a Followup: