68.1.131.10
In Reply to: RE: addendum query - Ashly 2001 posted by Davey on October 24, 2009 at 21:41:23
I appreciate the suggestion and it's certainly reasonable, although I hoped to avoid something like the DCX2496 (not many choices at that price point). I hoped a product like the Ashly might be suitable as a permanent solution, but that depends upon (beyond its build quality, which is an unknown for me) the suitability of its slopes to the architecture of the junior Maggies, but what made that specific choice intriguing is the fact that one can tweak its behavior at the XO frequencies.
The other scary thing about a digital XO is the daunting range of configurations. I think my heart would be content with a little less fiddling than the DCX2496 permits, but I could be wrong. It might be fun to experiment with the myriad permutations such a device affords, but what if I end up back where I started? At least I would have exorcised the demon. Oh what a can of worms this upstream shift has opened!
"Jazz is not dead - it just smells funny" FZ
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2009, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
[ Go Green ]
[ Take5 ]
