In Reply to: Re: 1.6 passive line xo update posted by MikeCh on February 8, 2001 at 14:15:50:
>>>Oh. If you don't mind me asking, what are you using now? You're not running a passive with two amps and the network, right?i'm temporarily using a Nad S100 until my beloved Melos come back home;
i think it's a very good piece of gear, very musical and transparent>>>The bass amps has level pots built-in and I'll probably use a set on the RM200 until I figure out the appropriate attenuation; then I'll replace it with some good Caddock resistors.
level pots on the amps? hmmm that means more degradation, though
i've to confess it's must be very convenient; do you think Caddock
is more transparent than Vishay? i was myself wondering about this>>>The RM200 is spec'd at 15K per leg and the AudioSource is supposed to be 10K.
well Mike these seem to me really low values, so unless your
present preamp has a lot of gain you may well gonna need go activebest, paco
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: 1.6 passive line xo update - paco 17:35:29 02/08/01 (4)
- Re: 1.6 passive line xo update - MikeCh 10:14:18 02/09/01 (0)
- resistors - Arbelos 06:03:51 02/09/01 (2)
- now seriously... - paco 06:44:37 02/09/01 (0)
- hey Arbelos! why do you make me suffering so much? :-) (nt) - paco 06:16:29 02/09/01 (0)