|
Planar Speaker Asylum Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences. |
|
|
|
Planar Speaker Asylum Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences. |
|
In Reply to: Re: 1.6 passive line xo works! posted by Davey on February 4, 2001 at 18:02:44:
Now that I see the original circuit diagram, it makes a lot more sense. But, brings up a few more questions.As stated elsewhere in this thread, this circuit should be placed immediately before the amps. But, how should the amps be connected to the MG1.6s? It seems to me that if you have this xo between pre-amp and amps, and the amps connected to the stock tweeter and woofer connections, you'd have two "identical" xo's in the signal path. If you still have the stock crossovers in the 1.6s, you'd have redundant xo's, correct? Would I need to by-pass the stock crossovers to use the passive line xo?
Also, how would I scale the values of the caps/resistors to match amps with 100k input impedance? Is there a formula for this? Thanks again.
Chia-Hao
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: 1.6 passive line xo works! - CH Chang 15:42:33 02/05/01 (7)
- resistor calculation - MikeCh 16:27:31 02/05/01 (3)
- Re: resistor calculation - CH Chang 22:07:34 02/05/01 (2)
- Re: resistor calculation - davey 10:16:49 02/06/01 (1)
- Thanks! (nt) - CH Chang 20:50:16 02/06/01 (0)
- Re: 1.6 passive line xo works! - MikeCh 15:50:46 02/05/01 (1)
- Re: Thanks, that's what I thought. (nt) - CH Chang 16:16:40 02/05/01 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
