|
Planar Speaker Asylum Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences. |
|
|
|
Planar Speaker Asylum Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences. |
|
In Reply to: Re: 1.6 passive line xo works! posted by Arbelos on February 5, 2001 at 06:56:46:
OK, i'll deal with the new connections soon, but now i'm
more relaxed by knowing there is no danger... :)Paoletti, the designer of the Donizetti's says these amps
are very silent, with just some mechanical noise from the
transformer, so he thinks the cause should be looked for
somewhere elseyes, the NZ guy says he did a simulation with Calsod (?) and
according to his model the xover points are wrong; you can read
the details of his arguments by opening the long attachment
enclosed in my message; also, i sent a copy to Daveyi've just tested for transients/dynamics: boy oh boy!! this may well be
the department where more spectacular improvements can be found;
for fast transients my favourite work in Walton symph 1, 2nd
movement (Rattle good, Daniel even better, though a little forward),
and for brutal dynamics Penderecki's Symph 3, 2nd mov (Witt);
after listening to them i now see that the magnepan panels need
much more control that the one which can be got through the coils;
this is what Davey predicted and he was absolutely right!!!best, paco
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: 1.6 passive line xo works! - pco 09:32:17 02/05/01 (1)
- Re: 1.6 passive line xo works! - Double Trouble 15:52:42 02/05/01 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
