![]() |
K&K Audio / Lundahl Transformers Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share youe ideas and experiences. |
|
In Reply to: Mo' Thoughts posted by Lynn Olson on December 5, 2003 at 15:50:06:
Hi Lynn,I need to think some more about what you have written before a proper reply. It's interesting and it has stimulated various ideas for me to pursue.
However one thought that did occur to me was a solution I have been trying to find to a very low capacitance balanced input that I wanted to build from triodes. The reason for the low capacitance requirement was the usual, I want to use a 11:1 fully balanced stepup transformer and the input capacitance gets a bit hairy when multiplied by 121 times! Even pentodes can be a bit heavy with this input trannie. However if we take two diff pairs and construct them from a pentode on the input side in cathode follower mode into the CCS tail and a common grid UHF triode on output side then we get - to some degree - the best of both worlds. Using two of these with the triode anodes feeding a PP interstage completes the picture. The triode distortion characteristic and sound would dominate and balance between the two diff pairs is acheived by tweaking the CCSs. I hope the picture above conveys my thinking... Maybe this would work as a low capacitance front end for the Amity? When I get time I think I'll knock this up, I guess I need pentodes and triodes that bias up to similar points...
ciao
James
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- An aside your thoughts suggested... - JamesD 05:16:45 12/07/03 (7)
- Here's another one ... - Lynn Olson 17:34:23 12/11/03 (2)
- Re: Here's another one ... - JamesD 12:39:27 12/14/03 (1)
- Unusual behavior from grounded-grids ... - Lynn Olson 14:59:23 12/14/03 (0)
- It boils down to a pentode CF driving a GG triode - Lynn Olson 13:56:45 12/07/03 (3)
- Re: It boils down to a pentode CF driving a GG triode - JamesD 08:27:07 12/09/03 (2)
- Setting up the bias - Gary P 12:00:45 12/10/03 (1)
- Re: Setting up the bias - JamesD 03:50:58 12/11/03 (0)