In Reply to: As always, a very informative reply. posted by RC Daniel on June 29, 2010 at 00:54:18:
Hi,
> Thankfully, we have some great custom winders over here Oz,
> so transformers should not be a problem. Will certainly give
> this some thought.
Great. Do download the Fusion Manual and read that too, it has more detail on the whole range of implementations.
> Also, are you able to briefly share how the buffer affects the sonics?
To be honest, I have major issues telling if it is in or not, the 300B Fusion Amp, which is so far our only application, unless I turn up the volume past what the 300B Amp handles on it's own.
I think it is the little extra circuit trick described in the whitepaper on page 3 that makes all the difference to conventional buffers, as I have heard a few of these.
I am thinking making the next complete Fusion Amp a Monoblock that can can use either 2A3 or 45 with a DC coupled frontend and permanent Fusion plus 8/16 Ohm outputs.
Or maybe a 45/2A3 Amp with the full bore 160W/8Ohm & 260W/4Ohm Quad Pack of outputs? I think a 260W 45 Amp would be quite a fun thing to have.
Ciao T
Thor
At 20 bits, you are on the verge of dynamic range covering fly-farts-at-20-feet to intolerable pain. Really, what more could we need?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: As always, a very informative reply. - Thorsten 08:22:28 06/29/10 (1)
- Thanks again T, may just take this path. nt. - RC Daniel 16:45:23 06/30/10 (0)