In Reply to: Re: DIY DAC posted by Thorsten on January 10, 2005 at 05:19:04:
Hi T,I double checked the rockna-line webpage again. The schema indicates an AD1802 receiver, but the the product description says it uses an AD1892... The same with the receiver, schema has PLL1705 while the description says PLL1707... Maybe the schema is old and hasn't been updated??? Gotta shoot 'em email to confirm. Anyways, I checked the AD1892 .pdf datasheet, and on -Page 18- there is an option of an ASRC Bypass Mode. Hmmm...
The diagram above also indicates that the Asynch Sample Rate Converter can be bypassed and go direct to the Output Serial Interface.
Thanks again for sharing valueble empirical experience on this.
fred
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: DIY DAC - fred76 11:02:06 01/10/05 (18)
- Re: DIY DAC - Thorsten 12:55:56 01/10/05 (15)
- Re: DIY DAC - fred76 01:17:47 01/12/05 (14)
- Re: DIY DAC - Thorsten 03:04:51 01/12/05 (13)
- PS... - Thorsten 03:59:17 01/12/05 (12)
- Will this PCM56 DAC outperform Yeo's ? - mamu 11:37:27 01/12/05 (6)
- Re: Will this PCM56 DAC outperform Yeo's ? - Thorsten 12:08:34 01/12/05 (5)
- Re: Will this PCM56 DAC outperform Yeo's ? - mamu 10:56:52 01/13/05 (4)
- Re: Will this PCM56 DAC outperform Yeo's ? - Thorsten 13:14:39 01/13/05 (3)
- Re: Will this PCM56 DAC outperform Yeo's ? - fred76 02:04:51 01/14/05 (2)
- Re: Will this PCM56 DAC outperform Yeo's ? - Thorsten 04:29:23 01/14/05 (1)
- Re: Will this PCM56 DAC outperform Yeo's ? - fred76 01:59:45 01/15/05 (0)
- Re: PS... - fred76 11:15:33 01/12/05 (1)
- Re: PS... - Thorsten 12:14:40 01/12/05 (0)
- How about this? - NewbieBaby 11:01:20 01/12/05 (2)
- Re: How about this? - Thorsten 15:09:24 01/12/05 (1)
- Hooray - NewbieBaby 17:32:54 01/12/05 (0)
- Re: DIY DAC - fred76 11:13:53 01/10/05 (1)
- Re: DIY DAC - fortranca 15:12:25 01/11/05 (0)