Vinyl Asylum

Welcome Licorice Pizza (LP) lovers! Setup guides and Vinyl FAQ.

Return to Vinyl Asylum


Only the best equipment for this audiophile . . .

216.67.39.70

Posted on November 5, 2009 at 13:33:06
hiatt@alaska.net
Audiophile

Posts: 829
Joined: December 9, 2000
Contributor
  Since:
November 1, 2005

You will also notice the clever way of feeling the base foundation of the music through the elbow, the arm, and the hand to the chin. No need for a subwoofer here.

In fact, I'm not sure if Ed was really alive for this picture. I'm thinking the taxidermist has done a fabulous job of capturing Ed in one of his most exciting moments.

Life imitates art:, posted on November 6, 2009 at 07:37:03
JimK
Audiophile

Posts: 3624
Location: Maple Grove, MN.
Joined: April 18, 2008
Contributor
  Since:
October 2, 2008





Jim


Pictured thinking about Jim Morrison?, posted on November 6, 2009 at 07:29:06
Craiger56
Audiophile

Posts: 2397
Location: San Jose CA
Joined: April 3, 2002
Contributor
  Since:
December 29, 2003
I remember something about some temporary friction between them.

The thing you have to remember about Sullivan is..., posted on November 6, 2009 at 07:01:38
teenage diplomat
Audiophile

Posts: 190
Location: burke, va usa
Joined: February 3, 2001
...That he had "a really big shoe." That's what I thought he said every week, although I think he really said "show".

Sullivan was a major player back then, starting at the newspapers, and segueing into both radio and TV. He could make or break artists in his column, and for almost 20 years he virtually dictated American pop culture taste via his broadcasts. Impossible to do today? Oprah, anyone?

Another take on this ...., posted on November 6, 2009 at 05:35:56
Jim E
Audiophile

Posts: 417
Joined: April 25, 2000
I remember when, at the age of about 7 years, I was given my first record player. It made Ed's look pretty fancy. Even so, I went to the junk store and was given a dozen speaker elements from old TVs and radios, and hooked all of them up to my little turntable. I would sit there and marvel at the sound from all directions - much like old Ed! I thought it was the coolest thing ever.

Of course it wasn't near as exciting as hooking up a speaker to the wall socket and watching a speaker thrash itself to death and send up a puff of smoke. That was really cool! I still can't figure out why I'm still alive.

Enjoy!

Jim E

I did the same, only different., posted on November 6, 2009 at 06:41:18
JimK
Audiophile

Posts: 3624
Location: Maple Grove, MN.
Joined: April 18, 2008
Contributor
  Since:
October 2, 2008
When I was about the same age I hated the sound given off from my portable radio, so I bought some "whizzer" car speakers from Radio Shack, bolted them to some thin, flat metal pieces about 8" long to act as mounts, and screwed the "mounts" to the back of the headboard on my bed. I think I had four speakers sticking up there at any given time.....

And I remember wishing I had more bass, and wondered if I could somehow put a big ol' honkin' one under the bed, firing upwards....

Wow. I didn't remember that until I read your post.

Jim


Better the speaker than than one of Mother's hairpins. )MT(, posted on November 6, 2009 at 05:42:28
J. S. Bach
Audiophile

Posts: 6607
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Joined: November 28, 2001
Contributor
  Since:
June 29, 2004



Dave
Later Gator,

Crank up your talking machine, grab a jar of your favorite "kick-back", sit down, relax, and let the go

Living down at the bottom of the globe as I do, I've never quite GOT why Ed Sullivan, posted on November 5, 2009 at 23:43:04
Timbo in Oz
Audiophile

Posts: 11407
Location: Canberra - in the ACT - SE Australia
Joined: January 30, 2002
became such an icon to so many Americans.

I have watched at least 30 different clips of him interviewing all sorts of folk, and many repeats of him with Elvis the Pelvis, and the Beatles.

What prompted my posting was the OP's last paragraph.

"In fact, I'm not sure if Ed was really alive for this picture. I'm thinking the taxidermist has done a fabulous job of capturing Ed in one of his most exciting moments."

I laughed out loud, quite apt about his rigid(?) style. I'm not sure he was 'really alive', most of the times I've watched him.




Warmest

Timothy Bailey
The Skyptical Mensurer and Audio Scrounger

And gladly would he learn and gladly teach - Chaucer. ;-)!

'Still not saluting.'

http://www.theanalogdept.com/tim_bailey.htm

RE: all the best talent played Ed Sullivan...., posted on November 6, 2009 at 16:18:15
user510
Manufacturer

Posts: 455
Location: Seattle, USA
Joined: September 5, 2008
Contributor
  Since:
October 23, 2004
We made fun of Ed not only for his death-warmed-over appearance and mannerisms but also for his dentures which seemed to get a little loose on him, resulting in some very extreme sibilance within his speech;-)


But we didn't watch "Ed Sullivan" for Ed's sake. We watched to see who was on. From musical acts to stand-up comedians to animal acts to aboriginal ceremonies out of Africa, to.... anything that was interesting.


Without a doubt he was a true show business icon for his time....but not for his personality, which was notorious, but for the talented acts he could bring on to the show, which were always worthy.

-Steve





i think a lot of it came from being in N.Y., posted on November 6, 2009 at 14:06:27
beach cruiser
Audiophile

Posts: 2612
Location: so cal
Joined: September 24, 2003
He was a Newspaper man from probably the biggest media center at the time. Furthermore, at that time, newspapers still were looked on as an important part of society, the informed electorate part of America's founding was still thought important back then, so newspaper guys were a big deal, top of the media heap.

I think he had a broadway beat, which led to him filling in when the first choice on a variety radio show fell through, (If I remember correctly. It's been a while since I read the information and it wasn't very interesting then, either.)

He had a famous eye for talent., posted on November 6, 2009 at 12:18:22
richardl
Audiophile

Posts: 1914
Joined: September 5, 2002
People actually wanted to see his guests. He pushed the guests and not himself. Most shows were far worse in his day. Check out Andy Williams, The Osmonds etc. for worse guests etc.

RE: Living down at the bottom of the globe as I do, I've never quite GOT why Ed Sullivan, posted on November 6, 2009 at 00:08:54
Ugly
Audiophile

Posts: 1421
Location: Des Moines, WA
Joined: August 22, 2006
Probably simply because he had a show on TV which beat staring at the wall. Not much competition on the airwaves back then.

He was a powerful man in show business back then..., posted on November 6, 2009 at 02:27:14
pretzel_logic
Audiophile

Posts: 1874
Location: NE Illinois
Joined: October 30, 2002
Contributor
  Since:
February 10, 2009
Ed was one of the main players as far as bringing in talent. If he had a show today it would be on the lines of American idol but of course his personality wouldn't get him close to a mike on TV today. He was also pretty much of a dickhead as well from things I've read.

Brian

RE: He was a powerful man in show business back then..., posted on November 7, 2009 at 14:39:04
Tao
Actually it was Jack Babb, who was the talent coordinator for the Sullivan show, who was the most responsible for the acts that got on the show. It was great exposure for any act to be seen with Sullivan on his show though.

As a side note, as the Beatles were just beginning to develop a following on the British concert circuit it was Peter Prichard, Babb’s European talent coordinator, who initially brought the Beatles to Babb’s attention. A few months later it was Babb and Prichard that brought them to Sullivan’s attention.

Those were what most folks listened to, back in the day....., posted on November 5, 2009 at 18:11:19
Marc Bratton
Audiophile

Posts: 4582
Joined: June 15, 2000
...sorta like the glorified boom boxes (excuse me, 'portable stereos') that are the default in so many homes today. It was only the 'hi-fi nuts' who took music seriously enough to BUILD their own amps and speakers; my beloved father was one of those, and is probably who I got this passion from. I don't remember enjoying music any less thru those 'record players' than I do my system today. Guess my expectations were lower...

I did the same listening to the We Five in '65 on a Philco portable, posted on November 5, 2009 at 22:28:01
hiatt@alaska.net
Audiophile

Posts: 829
Joined: December 9, 2000
Contributor
  Since:
November 1, 2005
in my 8 X 12 dorm room at Montana State. Still cannot believe that two of us lived in that tiny dorm space, and I made 90 cents an hour at the switchboard.

Still, it was the music that counted, and, hey, I had two speakers to move around instead of just one.

I saw that in the bins the other day..., posted on November 5, 2009 at 16:03:20
gortnipper
Audiophile

Posts: 502
Location: Seattle expat in Auckland
Joined: November 28, 2003
I passed on it, not a big WSS fan...

Hard to believe this is the same guy, posted on November 5, 2009 at 15:46:31
60SXRD
that brought the Beatles and Stones, etc. to the USA. Thanks Ed!

Or that big eared, squeeky rodent . . . (pic), posted on November 5, 2009 at 22:34:08
hiatt@alaska.net
Audiophile

Posts: 829
Joined: December 9, 2000
Contributor
  Since:
November 1, 2005

nt

Topo Gigo or something like that? - nt, posted on November 6, 2009 at 10:59:12
60SXRD
nt

RE: Don't forget Sr. Wensas!, posted on November 5, 2009 at 19:32:58
amioutaline?
Audiophile

Posts: 309
Location: Great Smoky Mountains
Joined: August 29, 2008
Or the plate spinner! I loved the plate spinner!

'Sall Right? 'Sall Right!!!, posted on November 5, 2009 at 20:09:51
Opus 104
Audiophile

Posts: 2721
Location: Northern Virginia
Joined: June 13, 2008
Contributor
  Since:
July 20, 2008







"It was a dark and stormy night. I had taken a creative writing course." – Crow T. Robot, MST 3000.


RE: Only the best equipment for this audiophile . . ., posted on November 5, 2009 at 15:28:45
hifipaul
Audiophile

Posts: 124
Location: NY
Joined: December 22, 2008
He looks impatient. Not a happy face there.

OK, that was the funnest post I've read in a long time!, posted on November 5, 2009 at 15:19:26
JoshT
Audiophile

Posts: 2841
Location: Eastern Massachusetts
Joined: July 4, 2000
Contributor
  Since:
July 22, 2000
Great picture. Great commentary! I'm still giggling.
___
"If you are the owner of a new stereophonic system, this record will play with even more brilliant true-to-life fidelity. In short, you can purchase this record with no fear of its becoming obsolete in the future."

RE: Only the best equipment for this audiophile . . ., posted on November 5, 2009 at 13:35:28
LonglostLPMan
Audiophile

Posts: 94
Location: Lexington, KY
Joined: August 13, 2008
VERY funny and creative! Thanks for the late afternoon laugh!
Just got back... been gone too long!

Page processed in 0.218 seconds.