|
Posts: 3116
Joined: March 26, 2001
|
We will have to just disagree on this point. Of the list I only have 'Modern Times' on vinyl. I too have been collecting vinyl for about 40 years but only have 5,000 in the collection. 'Modern Times' is compressed, flat as a pancake and really lacking in resolution. Sounds more like a low-rez download. Does it sound awful? No. But it is far from a great sounding record. I could name dozens if not hundreds of pop/rock recordings that simple blow this title away sonically. Musically it is top notch, like most of Dylans recent output. Yes the vinyl is thick, little surface noise, etc., but the recording itself is average at best. I would never drag out any of this Dylan stuff to show folks what great hi-fi is about, at least sonically. Now musically? You bet. Dylan is incredible. In the last few weeks I have picked up Spencer Day 'Vagabond', John Mayer 'Where The Light Is', John Mayer 'Continuum', Keith Urban 'Golden Road' and Jackie Ryan 'Doozy' all on CD. While the sonics vary on these discs, every one of them simple blow away Dylan at least sonically. I could waste a great deal of bandwidth with more examples and I haven't even listed the recent vinyl acquisitions. Actually I was listening to 'Love & Theft' this morning, on CD no less. Much better sonically versus 'Modern Times', but still no great shakes. I have no issue with one enjoying the music of a given artist, especially someone like Dylan. And perhaps his music transcends the sonic issues of his work. But great sounding they are not. Average at best. My observations are not an attack on the musical merits of Dylan for he is a genuis and in many ways is only getting better with age. My observations are an attack on the sonics. It is a shame that the sonics of his work do not match the greatness of the music. Given this I must point out the contradiction of the two and the contradiction of his own statements regarding this subject.
|