Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies.
Return to Computer Audio Asylum
Message Sort: Post Order or Asylum Reverse Threaded
Yesterday I did some comparisons between 96kHz and 192kHz on my MAC Mini
68.126.21.44 |
||
Posted on February 8, 2009 at 18:28:35 | ||
The sound card in my Mac Mini is the Intel High Definition Audio 0x83847680 which does 192 kHz/32-bit quality for two channels, and 96 kHz/32-bit for up to eight channels. It comes standard, I've done no upgrading. I can now confirm iTunes 8.0.2 does do 32 Bit music files, something no consumer physical format can do. I compared the 96kHz and 192kHz sound samples from Acousence and here are my impressions. The 192kHz samples had more ambiance, notes have a longer decay, the bass is fuller and the strings are even smoother plus it sounds more live. I can "feel" the music on my skin almost as vividly as when I listen to live music. I also compared these samples to my DSD recorded Exton SACD of Mahler's 6th with Ashkenazy and the Czech Philharmonic recorded in the House of Artist, Prague. The SACD and the 192kHz download were very close, the 192kHz download had more of the "live" feel on my skin but the percussion was more tingling exciting on the SACD, the string tone was actually smoother on the 192kHz. I would have to hear more examples but overall I think 192kHz music files may be sonically as good as or superior to SACD. I also have 192kHz PCM on DVD-Audios but I thought the music files easily beat those. I wonder if a DSD music file would also beat an SACD? The 32 Bit 192kHz music file was a Jazz recording from Unipheye Music and sounded very real, there may be a further advantage to 32 Bit, I'd have to hear a few classical works before forming an opinion. http://www.unipheyemusic.com/filetest.cfm Some of these files are quite huge and I may be looking at external memory sooner than expected. 24 Bit 96kHz 4608 kbps WAV audio file 24 Bit 192kHz 9216 kbps WAV audio file 32 Bit 192kHz 12288 kbps WAV audio file The 32 Bit 192kHz is almost 100 times larger than 128 kpbs MP3, that's a lot of memory. I will down the road need an external memory device that is whisper quiet as I live in a studio apartment and I understand many of them are noisy. Any ideas? The performance of my little MAC mini was quite amazing considering I was using the analog outputs using a Stereo Mini to two RCA Monster Cable using one of the AUX inputs on my tubed pre-amp. Give me high resolution or remain silent, Teresa |
Shhhhh...., posted on February 8, 2009 at 19:29:04 | |
Posts: 5285
Joined: April 7, 2000 |
Don't tell Thomas Pf....he thinks we're imagining it. |
These differences...., posted on February 8, 2009 at 21:15:22 | |
Posts: 5285
Joined: April 7, 2000 |
....are more easily discernible with better playback software. |
RE: External Storage, posted on February 9, 2009 at 12:17:23 | |
Posts: 841
Location: Toronto, Canada Joined: November 10, 2004 |
Nice review! The only external storage that I have found that is quiet enough in my small apartment are notebook drives in external enclosures: The size of notebook drives has increased tremendously up to 500GB now (e.g. Samsung). I use several external Macally PHR-S250CC enclosures. Luckily the Man Mini is also very quiet... Die gefährlichste Weltanschauung ist die Weltanschauung derjenigen, die die Welt nicht angeschaut haben. Alexander von Humboldt (1769-1859) |
Vielen Dank, Ralf...., posted on February 9, 2009 at 13:46:07 | |
Posts: 5285
Joined: April 7, 2000 |
Keep up the good work, and setting the "record" straight. |
What is going on?, posted on February 9, 2009 at 14:09:27 | |
Teresa, Lately you have become a Mac maven. First a Macbook, then iPod, now a Mini. What is next, an iPhone? George |
RE: I think we're getting all numbers happy again, posted on February 9, 2009 at 16:24:30 | |
Posts: 1886
Location: Indiana Joined: August 17, 2005 |
I'll drink to that. |
RE: Totally Quiet Disk, posted on February 9, 2009 at 17:32:43 | |
Posts: 5285
Joined: April 7, 2000 |
Good advice, Abe. |
Thanks I saved the link for when I am ready for more memory! (;-) nt, posted on February 9, 2009 at 18:32:34 | |
Give me high resolution or remain silent, Teresa |
I consider myself Contra'd ;) Cheers, nt, posted on February 9, 2009 at 18:59:44 | |
Posts: 5957
Location: Canada Joined: November 10, 2004 |
nt |
RE: You're a tough crowd, Fred., posted on February 10, 2009 at 09:06:09 | |
Posts: 6581
Location: So. CA Joined: October 20, 2002 |
Playback engine is a term used by guys like Sonic Studio. |
A perfect dialectic....thanks, Jim! [nt], posted on February 10, 2009 at 09:42:24 | |
Posts: 5285
Joined: April 7, 2000 |
nt |
RE: Dialectic?, posted on February 10, 2009 at 18:23:27 | |
Posts: 499
Location: New York Joined: November 2, 2005 |
> Perhaps you meant “dialectric� You mean "dielectric"? ;-> |
Perhaps...., posted on February 11, 2009 at 00:03:55 | |
Posts: 5285
Joined: April 7, 2000 |
....it's a dialogue. ;--0 |
Placebo anyone? nt., posted on February 11, 2009 at 08:51:52 | |
Posts: 12589
Location: N. California Joined: April 9, 2004 |
d |
RE: Placebo anyone?, posted on February 11, 2009 at 10:27:34 | |
Posts: 5285
Joined: April 7, 2000 |
Is that similar to Sudoku, with more colors? |